Mostly in the map results, where the rating and count appear next to competitors. That makes the platform your customers already see more valuable than any specialist review site.

The moment reviews are read

Rarely on a review platform, and rarely by somebody who set out to read reviews.

It happens in the search results, on a phone, where three businesses appear together with a star rating and a number beside each.

The comparison is immediate and largely unconscious: four point eight from ninety, against four point six from twelve, against no rating at all.

A proportion of people never read a single review. They read the two numbers and choose.

What that implies

Several things that change where effort should go.

The count matters as much as the average, because a high rating from a handful reads as insufficient evidence.

Recency matters, because a listing whose latest review is from 2017 raises a question the rating does not answer.

And the platform matters enormously, because reviews on a site nobody sees in the results are doing far less work than the count suggests.

Which is the argument for concentrating on one place rather than spreading across five.

The platform hierarchy for a local business

The first is where the majority of the value sits for most local trades, because it is the only one that appears at the moment of comparison.

A worked example

A business with a good reputation spread across four platforms: eleven reviews here, eight there, six on a third, and five on a fourth.

Thirty reviews in total, and every listing looked thin.

They chose one platform, the map listing, and sent everybody there for a year.

That listing reached forty-two, and it was the one appearing in search results beside competitors.

The others were left as they were, and stopped being mentioned.

Their observation was that the total number had barely changed and the effect was completely different, because thirty spread across four places is invisible and forty in one is not.

The four lines shown

What actually appears in a result is worth understanding, because it is not the review you would have chosen.

Search results frequently show a snippet of a review, chosen algorithmically, sometimes the most recent and sometimes one considered representative.

You do not control which, which is a further argument for having enough that any given one is reasonable.

A business with four reviews, one of which is lukewarm, has a meaningful chance of that lukewarm one being the visible snippet.

With forty, the odds of any single weak review being the one shown fall substantially.

Recency and why it matters

Under-appreciated relative to the rating.

Somebody comparing businesses is assessing whether each is still operating well now, not whether it was good in 2018.

A listing with a steady trickle reads as a business currently doing work. One with a cluster from two years ago and nothing since raises an obvious question.

Which means a slow continuous flow beats an intense burst, and it is the argument for asking as a habit rather than as a campaign.

Two a month, indefinitely, produces a better listing than twenty in one month and none afterwards.

Photographs on the listing

Related and frequently forgotten, since reviews are not the only thing shown.

The listing carries photographs, and those appear alongside the rating in the results and on the listing itself.

Businesses that add their own get a listing that looks like their business. Those that do not get whatever customers uploaded, or a picture of the street.

Which means a small effort here changes the whole impression a comparison creates, and it is a one-off task rather than an ongoing one.

Worth adding: finished work, the team, the van, and the premises if there are any.

The counter-case

Where the map listing is not the priority.

Business-to-business work where buyers use trade platforms, procurement processes or references rather than public search.

Regulated professions where reviews are restricted, and the effort belongs elsewhere entirely.

Trades where a specialist platform genuinely dominates and customers use it as their starting point, which is true in some sectors and worth checking rather than assuming.

The test is where your own customers say they found you, which the enquiry record answers directly and without guesswork.

What the rating actually influences

Two separate effects worth distinguishing.

The first is persuasion: somebody comparing three listings and choosing one.

The second is visibility, since review count, recency and content contribute to which businesses appear in local results at all.

Which means reviews are not only a conversion factor. A business with more of them, more recently, mentioning the service and the area, tends to appear more often as well as convert better.

That compounds, and it is the reason a listing that has been collecting reviews steadily for two years is difficult for a newer competitor to displace.

It also means the work has a lag: reviews collected this quarter affect visibility over the following ones rather than immediately.

Choosing which platform

A decision worth making once, deliberately.

Search for your own service and area on a phone and look at what appears. Whatever carries ratings in those results is where your reviews are most visible.

Then check whether any specialist platform appears prominently for your trade, since some do and some are invisible outside their own site.

Ask your last twenty customers which they looked at, which frequently contradicts assumptions.

And then send everybody to that one place, consistently, rather than offering a choice.

What to do

  1. Search for your service as a customer would.
  2. Note which platforms show ratings in the results.
  3. Pick one and send everybody there.
  4. Aim for steady rather than sudden.
  5. Keep the count growing rather than chasing the average.
  6. Leave the other listings accurate but unpromoted.

The fifth is the counterintuitive one. A four point six from ninety outperforms a five from six, because volume reads as evidence and perfection reads as insufficient data.

How to build that count is covered in the moment to ask for a review.

Frequently asked questions

Where are reviews actually read?

In the search results on a phone, where businesses appear together with a rating and a count. A proportion of people never read a single review.

Does the count matter as much as the rating?

Yes. A high rating from a handful reads as insufficient evidence, and volume reads as proof that a business is genuinely operating.

Which platform matters most?

For most local trades, the map listing, because it is the only one appearing at the moment of comparison in the results.

Should I spread reviews across platforms?

No. Thirty across four places is invisible; forty in one is not. Concentrate on the platform that appears in your own search results.

Why does recency matter?

Somebody is assessing whether you are still good now. A cluster from two years ago with nothing since raises a question the rating does not answer.

Is a perfect rating best?

Not necessarily. Four point six from ninety outperforms five from six, because volume reads as evidence and perfection from few reads as insufficient data.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Reviews spread across four platforms?

Pick the one that appears in your own search results and send everybody there. The total barely changes and the effect does.

Start a Conversation