A search advertisement is read in about a second alongside competitors. The version that wins repeats the searcher's own words, answers the practical question, and says what happens next rather than describing the business.

What the reader is doing

They typed something specific, they are scanning results, and they will spend perhaps a second on each.

They are not reading your advertisement. They are checking whether it matches what they typed, and moving on if it does not.

That single fact explains why most small business advertisements underperform. They describe the business, and the reader was looking for confirmation of their own problem.

Match the words they used

The highest-return technique and the least clever one.

Somebody searching for emergency drain clearing should see those words. Not drainage solutions, not plumbing services, not the business name.

This works for two reasons. The reader recognises their own phrase instantly, and platforms generally treat relevance between the query, the advertisement, and the landing page as a quality factor, which affects what you pay.

So matching is both more persuasive and cheaper, which is unusual.

The practical requirement is tightly grouped campaigns. A single advertisement covering fifteen different services cannot match any of them, which is why broad groupings underperform regardless of how well the copy is written.

What belongs in the limited space

What does not belong: how long you have been established, quality claims, family owned, and anything a competitor could copy word for word.

The test on any line is whether a competitor could write the identical sentence. If so, it distinguishes nothing and is occupying space that could carry a fact.

Specifics beat adjectives

The general principle, and it holds across every line.

Same-day callouts available beats fast, reliable service. Callout from a stated figure beats competitive pricing. Answering until nine at night beats always here for you.

Each specific version is checkable, which is why it is believed, and each adjective version is what every competitor also wrote.

This also produces better qualified clicks, since somebody who reads a figure and clicks anyway has accepted it.

Extensions and the extra lines

Worth using because they occupy more of the results page at no additional cost per click.

Additional links to specific service pages, a callout line for the fee or the availability, a phone number that can be tapped directly, and location information.

An advertisement using these takes up considerably more space than one that does not, which matters as much as the wording when three competitors are stacked above and below.

The landing page is part of the advertisement

Frequently treated separately and genuinely not.

An advertisement about emergency drain clearing sending somebody to a homepage listing eleven services has broken its own promise. The reader clicked because of a specific phrase and has to find it again.

The page should repeat the phrase, answer the question the advertisement implied, and carry the action. That match affects conversion and it affects cost, since relevance runs through the whole chain.

Testing without enough traffic

An honest note for a small budget.

Running several variations and waiting for a statistically meaningful winner requires more clicks than most small campaigns produce in a season.

What is available: writing two or three genuinely different versions rather than variations of the same sentence, letting the platform rotate them, and reading the difference only when it is large and sustained.

Small differences on small numbers are noise, and rewriting monthly in response to them is how campaigns get worse rather than better.

What to check in the search terms report

The related discipline that makes copy work.

Reading what people actually typed shows you the words to use, which is more reliable than guessing. Phrases appearing repeatedly are the ones to put in the advertisement.

It also shows what to exclude, since an advertisement matching irrelevant searches is paying for clicks no copy could convert.

The check before publishing

Read the advertisement beside the query it targets and ask whether a stranger would see their own words.

Then read it beside two competitors and ask what is different. If the answer is nothing factual, the copy is decoration and the campaign will compete on bid alone, which is the contest a small budget loses, as covered in when an advertisement stops working.

Frequently asked questions

What is the reader actually doing?

Checking whether your advertisement matches what they typed, in about a second. They are not reading it, which is why business descriptions underperform.

What is the highest-return technique?

Repeating the searcher's own words. It is more persuasive and usually cheaper, since platforms treat query relevance as a quality factor affecting what you pay.

What belongs in the limited space?

The service in their words, the location, a practical differentiator such as availability or a callout fee, and what happens next.

What should be left out?

Years established, quality claims, family owned, and anything a competitor could write identically. If they could copy the line word for word, it distinguishes nothing.

Why do specifics work better?

They are checkable, which is why they are believed, and they qualify the click. Somebody who reads a figure and clicks anyway has already accepted it.

Can I split test on a small budget?

Not formally. Write two or three genuinely different versions, let them rotate, and read the difference only when it is large and sustained.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Advertisements describing your business to somebody with a burst pipe?

We rewrite them around what people actually typed, which usually improves the click rate and lowers the cost at the same time.

Start a Conversation