Decide which location is the master copy, keep originals at full size there, and treat everything else as a working copy. The website is not an archive, and neither is a phone.

The five places

Most small businesses have photographs in all of these and a clear answer about none of them.

On the phone that took them, in a camera roll of thousands. On the website, resized and compressed. In a messaging app where they were sent to somebody. On a computer, in a downloads folder. And occasionally on a memory card in a drawer.

Each of those is a partial copy of a different subset, and not one of them is complete.

Which means the practical answer to where any particular photograph lives is frequently that nobody knows for certain.

Why the website is not the archive

The most common misunderstanding and the most consequential.

Images uploaded to a site are resized and compressed, sometimes several times. The originals are not retained and the detail that was removed cannot be recovered.

Which is fine for the website and useless for anything else. A photograph good enough for a page at eight hundred pixels is not good enough for a printed brochure, a vehicle wrap, or a redesign at different dimensions.

And a site that is rebuilt, migrated or lost takes its media library with it, which businesses discover at exactly the moment they need the pictures.

Treat the site as a display copy. The archive lives elsewhere.

What a master copy looks like

The first is what makes it an archive rather than another working copy. Everything else can be produced from originals; nothing can be produced from a compressed web image.

A worked example

A joinery business commissioning a new website after seven years.

The designer asked for the original photographs. What existed was the old site's media library, everything resized to a maximum of nine hundred pixels.

The new design wanted full-width images, which meant either using the old ones scaled up and soft, or reshooting.

Seven years of finished work, much of it in private homes, could not be reshot.

They launched with a mixture of soft images from the old library and a handful of recent jobs photographed properly, and the site was noticeably weaker than it should have been.

The originals had existed once, on a phone that was replaced in 2018.

The phone problem

Where most business photographs actually live, and it is not a safe place.

Phones are lost, dropped, stolen and replaced. Camera rolls are automatically compressed by some backup services, and some sync arrangements delete local copies to save space.

And a camera roll mixing eleven thousand personal and business images is not searchable in any practical sense.

The habit that solves it: move business photographs off the phone and into the job folder at the end of each job, and clear them from the phone afterwards.

Two minutes per job, and it converts the phone from a fragile archive into what it should be, which is simply a camera.

Automatic backup, and what it does not do

Worth being precise, because people rely on it more than it deserves.

Phone photo backup copies images to a service, which protects against losing the phone. That is genuinely valuable.

What it does not do: organise anything, separate business from personal, keep full resolution on every plan, or make images findable by job.

Some services also store a reduced-quality version by default, which means the backup is not of the originals at all.

Check what yours actually stores before treating it as an archive, because the setting is frequently not what people assume.

The counter-case

Where an elaborate arrangement is not warranted.

A business whose photographs have no future use beyond the website. Some trades genuinely never reuse an image.

Somebody working alone with a small volume, where a single well-backed-up folder is sufficient and anything more is overhead.

And any situation where the images are of no lasting value, such as record shots taken purely to document a condition and never intended for publication.

Even then, the record shots are worth keeping with the job, because those are the ones that answer questions two years later.

Storage cost

Worth doing the arithmetic, because it is smaller than people fear.

A few thousand full-resolution photographs is a modest amount of storage, well within an inexpensive cloud plan.

For a business generating a few hundred images a year, the cost of keeping everything at full size indefinitely is a few dollars a month.

Which means selective deletion to save space is rarely worth the decision-making time. Keeping everything is cheaper than choosing what to keep.

The exception is video, which is genuinely large and worth managing more actively than photographs.

What to keep from each job

A judgement worth making at the time rather than accumulating everything indefinitely.

The finished work, from several angles, at full resolution. Anything hidden afterwards, which is the record you may need years later. And anything genuinely unusual.

What is not worth keeping: forty near-identical frames of the same thing, out-of-focus attempts, and shots taken to send somebody a quick question.

A five-minute cull at the point of filing keeps the archive usable, which matters more than the storage it saves.

The one exception is anything with a compliance or warranty dimension, where the rule is keep everything and worry about tidiness later.

Setting it up

  1. Choose one location as the master.
  2. Move the originals you still have into it, by job.
  3. Check your phone backup actually stores full resolution.
  4. Add a step to your job routine for moving new photographs across.
  5. Take one copy elsewhere periodically, so a deletion is survivable.
  6. Tell somebody else where it is.

The fifth catches the failure that syncing does not: a deleted folder syncs its own deletion to every copy, so the second location has to be genuinely separate rather than another synced device.

How the rest of the job files should be organised alongside is covered in files you cannot reach from site.


Frequently asked questions

Where do business photographs usually live?

On the phone that took them, on the website compressed, in a messaging app, in a downloads folder, and sometimes a memory card. Each is a partial copy.

Why is the website not an archive?

Uploaded images are resized and compressed, and the originals are not retained. They are unusable for print, vehicle graphics or a redesign at larger dimensions.

What makes a master copy?

Originals at full resolution, organised by job, backed up in more than one place, reachable by more than one person, and findable.

What is wrong with keeping them on a phone?

Phones are lost and replaced, some backup services compress automatically, and a camera roll of eleven thousand mixed images is not searchable.

Does automatic backup solve it?

It protects against losing the phone. It does not organise, separate business from personal, or necessarily store full resolution, which is often not the default.

Is storage expensive?

No. A few thousand full-resolution photographs sits within an inexpensive plan, so keeping everything costs less than the time spent deciding what to delete.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Rebuilding a site and cannot find the original photographs?

That is the moment people discover the website was never the archive, and by then it is too late.

Start a Conversation