Use it where you already know the answer and want it expressed differently. Do not use it where the difficulty is deciding what is true or what to recommend.

The distinction that decides everything

Some tasks are difficult because you do not know what to say.

Others are difficult because you know exactly what to say and putting it into words is tedious.

The second category is where this saves real time, and the first is where it produces confident nonsense.

Every honest use below is a version of that distinction.

Where it genuinely helps

The third is the most useful for most people. Dictating or typing rough notes about a job and asking for them as three paragraphs converts something you already know into something publishable, and every fact came from you.

The messages you write anyway

A practical application worth doing this month.

Every business sends the same handful of awkward messages: a delay, a decline, a price increase, a chase, an apology.

Those are difficult to write well under pressure and easy to write well with time.

Draft each one now, with the tool if it helps, then edit it into your own voice and keep it.

That is a genuine saving that repeats every time one is needed, and the facts are yours because you supplied the situation.

It is also the safest use, since nothing factual is being invented and you are reading every word before it goes anywhere.

Reacting is easier than starting

The underlying reason it helps at all.

Most people find a blank page harder than a wrong page, because reacting to something is easier than generating something.

Asking for three openings and disliking all of them still moves you forward, since you now know what you do not want.

That works even when the output is poor, which makes it robust in a way the other uses are not.

Use it deliberately that way: not to produce the thing, but to produce something to argue with.

A worked example

A business owner had been putting off writing a page for months.

He dictated four minutes of rough notes into his phone about how the job actually goes, then had those turned into structured paragraphs.

The output was ninety per cent his own content, rearranged, with the awkward spoken phrasing tidied.

He rewrote the opening, added a price range and a photograph, and published it the same afternoon.

The saving was about two hours and nothing in it had been invented, because every fact had come from his notes.

His assessment was that it had removed the part he disliked rather than the part that mattered.

Where it does not help

Stated plainly, since the boundary is what makes the rest safe.

Deciding what to charge, what to recommend, or which approach is right, all of which require judgement about your own business.

Anything factual you cannot verify yourself, which was the whole of the previous discussion.

Anything where being wrong has consequences: legal, safety, financial, or contractual.

And anything where the value is that a specific person said it, which includes most of what makes a small business worth choosing.

Those are not limitations to work around with better prompting, they are the boundary of the tool.

Keep a record of what worked

Since this is early and everybody is guessing.

Note which tasks you used it for and whether the result was worth the time, over a month.

Most people find two or three uses that genuinely help and a longer list that seemed promising and cost more than it saved.

Keep the two or three and stop doing the rest, which is a considerably better position than either enthusiasm or refusal.

And revisit it in six months, since the tools will change and your list should be based on trying rather than on anybody's claims.

Edit everything

The habit that has to survive whatever comes next.

Never publish or send anything without reading every word and changing some of them.

The reading catches the invented facts and the changing is what makes it sound like you rather than like everybody.

Where you would not have written a sentence that way, rewrite it, since a reader who knows you will notice and a reader who does not will notice the sameness.

If a draft needs no editing at all, it is probably generic enough that publishing it achieves nothing.

Watch what it does to your own voice

A slower effect worth noticing before it settles in.

Editing a fluent draft repeatedly pulls your writing toward the phrasing the draft used, because accepting a sentence is easier than replacing it.

Over months that produces pages that read competently and sound like nobody in particular, which is the outcome the whole week has been arguing against.

The safeguard is to write the first version yourself occasionally, on the pages that matter most, and compare it with what you have been producing.

If the difference is noticeable, the tool has been shaping more than the speed.

The counter-case

This is a week old and any confident account of it is premature.

The uses that look sensible now may look naive in a year, in either direction, and the tools will change considerably.

There is also a real risk in the drafting use itself, which is that a fluent draft is persuasive and it is easy to accept a structure or an emphasis you would not have chosen.

And a business with no time to write also has no time to edit properly, which is where the errors get published.

Use it where you know the answer, edit everything, and keep a list of what actually saved time.

What to try

  1. Dictate notes and have them structured.
  2. Draft the awkward messages you send repeatedly.
  3. Ask for options to react to.
  4. Never use it to decide anything.
  5. Never use it where you cannot verify.
  6. Edit every word before it goes out.
  7. Note what saved time over a month.

Step one is the most useful and the least discussed, since it takes what you already know and removes only the part you dislike.

Knowing when something is ready to publish is covered in knowing when a page is finished.


Frequently asked questions

What is the distinction?

Between tasks that are hard because you do not know what to say and tasks that are hard because you know exactly what to say and writing it is tedious. Only the second is helped.

What is the most useful application?

Turning rough notes into prose. Dictate what you know about a job and have it structured, and every fact came from you rather than from the tool.

What about repeated messages?

Draft the awkward ones now: a delay, a decline, a price increase, an apology. That saving repeats, and nothing factual is invented because you supplied the situation.

Why does reacting help?

Because a blank page is harder than a wrong page. Asking for three openings and disliking all of them still moves you forward, which works even when the output is poor.

Where does it not help?

Deciding what to charge or recommend, anything factual you cannot verify, anything with legal or safety consequences, and anything whose value is that a specific person said it.

What habit matters most?

Editing everything. If a draft needs no editing at all, it is probably generic enough that publishing it achieves nothing.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Putting off writing a page?

Dictate four minutes of rough notes about how the job actually goes, then have those structured. The facts stay yours.

Start a Conversation