When a Parcel Goes Missing

Three problems wearing one coat

A missing parcel is really three separate things, and the mistake is treating them as one.

A customer who has paid and has nothing, which is urgent and is about trust.

A carrier claim, which is slow, procedural, and about money.

And a cost that lands somewhere, which is an accounting question.

Handle them in that order. The customer does not care about the claim, has no relationship with the carrier, and did not choose them.

Do not make the customer wait for the claim

The single most damaging thing a business can do here, and it is common because it feels prudent.

Claims take weeks. Telling a customer they will be helped once the carrier responds means they are without their purchase and without a resolution for an indefinite period.

By the time the claim concludes you have lost them regardless of the outcome.

Replace or refund promptly, then pursue the claim on your own time. The claim may fail, and that is a cost of doing business rather than a reason to leave somebody waiting.

The delivered but not received case

The hardest version, and the one that generates most of the friction.

Tracking says delivered. The customer says nothing arrived. Both may be telling the truth.

Parcels get left with neighbours, put in unusual places, delivered to a similar address nearby, or marked delivered slightly early by a driver who intends to complete the round.

The useful response is a short list of checks before anything else: has anybody else in the household taken it in, is there a note, have they looked in the places a driver might leave something, and can the carrier provide the delivery location or a photograph.

That resolves a good proportion within a day, and it has to be asked in a way that does not read as an accusation, because most people are not lying and will react badly to the suggestion.

Decide your policy in advance

The reason this goes badly is almost always that it is being decided in the moment, under pressure, differently each time.

• How long after the due date before you act.
• What checks you ask the customer to make first.
• Whether you replace or refund, and who chooses.
• The value above which you require more before acting.
• Who has authority to approve it without asking.

Written down, this takes an hour and makes every future case a ten-minute job for whoever picks it up.

A worked example

A retailer handled missing parcels case by case, with the owner deciding each one.

Response times ran to several days, decisions varied, and two customers who had been treated differently for the same problem compared notes publicly.

They wrote a one-page policy: wait three working days past the due date, run four checks with the customer, then replace at no charge below a set value without asking anybody, refund on request, and pursue the carrier separately in a weekly batch.

Staff could act immediately, and the average resolution went from about five days to under one.

Claims recovered a little over half the value, which was roughly what it had been before.

The difference was that customers were no longer waiting for that outcome, and complaints on the subject effectively stopped.

Claims are procedural, so be organised

Carriers pay claims that are properly documented and decline ones that are not, and the difference is usually preparation rather than argument.

Keep the proof of posting or collection, the tracking record, the order value, and the packing details. Photograph anything unusual before it leaves.

File within the window, which is often shorter than people assume and starts from the dispatch or due date rather than from when you noticed.

Do the claims in a weekly batch rather than as they arise, since it is administrative work that benefits from being done in one sitting and does not need to be fast.

Expect a proportion to fail. Standard liability is limited, damage and loss are treated differently, and some categories are excluded entirely.

Track your own loss rate

A number most businesses do not have and that changes several decisions.

Count lost parcels as a proportion of parcels sent, monthly, by carrier and by region.

A rate that is normal is a cost to price into your margin. A rate that is concentrated with one carrier, or in one area, is a supplier problem to raise or a reason to route differently.

It also tells you whether additional cover is worth buying, which is otherwise a guess. If loss is rare, self-insuring is cheaper than paying a premium on every parcel.

Signature and photo options

Worth considering per order rather than universally.

A signature requirement removes the delivered but not received dispute almost entirely, and it also produces failed deliveries when nobody is home, which has its own cost and annoyance.

Photographic proof of delivery, offered by most carriers now, resolves a large share of disputes without the failed delivery problem.

A sensible arrangement is standard delivery below a value threshold and signature above it, with the threshold set from your own loss data rather than from instinct.

Say something before they chase you

The cheapest improvement available in this whole area.

If tracking has not moved in several days, or a delivery date has passed, you usually know before the customer does.

A short message saying you have noticed, you are looking into it, and here is what happens next converts a complaint into a service experience.

Most shops wait to be contacted, which means the first exchange starts with a frustrated customer rather than with you in control of it.

This can be partly automated by flagging orders whose tracking has stalled, and it takes a few minutes a day to review.

The counter-case

Replacing immediately without any checks is not the right answer either.

A small proportion of claims are not genuine, and a business known for replacing anything on request will find that proportion rises.

The protection is not suspicion of individuals, which poisons the relationship with the majority who are honest. It is a consistent process, a value threshold above which you ask for more, and a record of repeat claims from the same account.

Repeat claims are the only reliable signal, and they only exist if you keep the record, which is another reason to log every case rather than handling them informally.

The process

1. Write the policy down before you need it.
2. Contact the customer when tracking stalls, first.
3. Run the four checks without implying doubt.
4. Replace or refund promptly, at staff discretion below a value.
5. File the claim separately, in a weekly batch.
6. Log every case with carrier, region, and value.
7. Review the loss rate monthly.

Step four is where the relationship is saved or lost, and it happens before the claim is answered.

Telling somebody about a delay is covered in telling a customer their order is delayed.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.