Separate the time you take to dispatch from the time the carrier takes to deliver, state both, and quote something you meet nearly always rather than something you meet on a good week.

Two different periods

The confusion at the root of most delivery complaints.

Dispatch time is how long before the parcel leaves you. That is entirely within your control.

Transit time is how long the carrier takes. That is not.

A shop stating three to five days without saying which it means has made a promise it may not be able to keep and cannot explain when it fails.

Stating both separately is clearer and it protects you: "dispatched within one working day, then two to four days in transit" tells the customer what to expect and shows where any delay came from.

Quote the reliable figure, not the good one

The most common error, and it is optimism rather than dishonesty.

A business dispatching same-day when everything goes well, and in three days when it does not, tends to advertise same-day.

Which means every ordinary week produces disappointed customers, and the estimate is doing harm rather than reassuring anybody.

Quote what you achieve on a bad week. Beating it is a pleasant surprise; missing a promise is a complaint and occasionally a review.

The asymmetry is severe. Arriving early produces mild satisfaction. Arriving late produces an email, a refund request, and sometimes a public comment.

What the customer actually does

Worth understanding because it explains the weight of this.

Somebody who ordered something writes the expected date in their head. Whether or not they need it by then, that date becomes the standard.

On the day after, they check the tracking. On the day after that, they email.

Which means an estimate is not information. It is the point at which your customer service load begins, and a shop quoting optimistically is generating its own enquiries.

A worked example

A small manufacturer quoting five to seven days for delivery.

They usually dispatched within two days and the carrier usually took three, so most orders arrived in five. Perfectly fine.

The problem was the weeks they were busy, when dispatch took four days and the total reached eight or nine. That was perhaps one week in five, and it generated most of their customer emails.

They changed the quote to dispatched within three working days, then three to five days in transit, and added the dispatch date to the confirmation email.

Emails asking where an order was fell by roughly two thirds. Actual delivery times did not change at all.

What changed was that customers now knew which stage their order was at and when to expect the next thing to happen.

The counter-case

Where a conservative estimate costs you sales.

Categories where speed is the purchase decision, and a competitor quoting next day wins against your quoting four.

Gift purchases near an occasion, where a slow estimate means the customer buys elsewhere rather than risking it.

In those cases the answer is not optimistic quoting. It is either genuinely improving dispatch, or being explicit: a fast option at a higher price alongside a standard one, so the customer chooses.

Offering a choice is honest and converts better than a single conservative figure, because the person in a hurry has somewhere to go.

Cut-off times

A small addition that prevents a specific misunderstanding.

If orders placed after a certain time are processed the next day, say so on the product page rather than only in the terms.

Somebody ordering at eight in the evening believes their order was placed today. If your day ended at two, that difference is a day of the estimate they did not know they had spent.

Stating it also creates useful urgency: "order within three hours for dispatch today" is honest and effective at once.

Weekends and holidays

The most frequent source of unexpected delay.

Working days and days are not the same, and customers do not make the distinction. Three working days from a Thursday order is the following Tuesday, which nobody expects.

Say working days explicitly, and better still show the actual expected date rather than a duration.

A date removes the arithmetic entirely and removes the ambiguity with it. Nobody misinterprets a Tuesday.

What the confirmation email should say

The message customers keep, and usually the one that says least.

Most confirmations list what was ordered and the total, which the customer already knows. What they want is the timeline.

Include the expected dispatch date, the expected delivery window, and what will happen next: that a second email arrives when it ships, carrying the tracking.

Doing that turns the confirmation from a receipt into an answer, and it is the single cheapest reduction in order enquiries available.

Then send the second email when it actually dispatches. A customer who receives both messages has been told everything twice and has no reason to write.

Telling them when something slips

The part that turns a delay into either a minor inconvenience or a complaint.

An email saying an order will be a few days late, sent before the customer notices, converts a failure into an acceptable outcome almost every time.

The same delay discovered by the customer, with no message, produces an angry email regardless of the actual length.

It is the same delay. The difference is entirely in who noticed first.

Tracking, and whether to offer it

Worth deciding rather than defaulting to the cheapest postage.

An untracked parcel costs less and means neither of you knows where it is. Every enquiry about a late order becomes an unanswerable conversation.

Tracked postage costs more per parcel and removes most of those conversations, because the customer can answer their own question.

For anything above a modest value the tracked option usually pays for itself in time saved rather than in claims. It also gives you evidence when somebody says a parcel never arrived.

Send the tracking number automatically when the order dispatches. A tracking number sitting in your system that the customer has to ask for is doing none of the work it was paid for.

Setting yours

  1. Measure your actual dispatch time over the last thirty orders.
  2. Take the slowest reasonable case, not the average.
  3. State dispatch and transit separately.
  4. Say working days, or better, show a date.
  5. State the cut-off time.
  6. Email the customer when it dispatches, and again if it slips.

The first is the step nobody takes, and most businesses are surprised by the answer.

Where the customer goes when they want to check is covered next, and it is usually a page that does not exist.


Frequently asked questions

What are the two periods?

Dispatch time, which is within your control, and transit time, which is the carrier's. Stating both separately shows where any delay came from.

Should I quote my best case?

No, your reliable case. Quote what you achieve on a bad week. Beating it is a pleasant surprise; missing a promise generates a complaint.

Why is the asymmetry important?

Arriving early produces mild satisfaction. Arriving late produces an email, a refund request and sometimes a public review.

What does an estimate actually do?

It sets the date at which your customer service load begins. A shop quoting optimistically is generating its own enquiries.

Why show a date rather than a duration?

Because working days and days are not the same to a customer. Three working days from a Thursday is the following Tuesday, which nobody expects.

What should I do when something slips?

Email before the customer notices. The same delay discovered by the customer with no message produces an angry email regardless of length.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Fielding emails asking where orders are?

That is usually the estimate rather than the shipping, and measuring your real dispatch time is the place to start.

Start a Conversation