Every measurement tool starts from the day it is installed. A year of comparison data is only available to somebody who set it up a year ago, which makes the cheap version worth doing now.

The asymmetry

Setting up a measurement tool costs an hour. Not having a year of history when you need it costs a year.

Which means the decision is not whether the tool is worth using now, but whether you might want its history later.

Almost every business eventually wants to compare against last year, and almost every one discovers it at the moment the comparison is unavailable.

The cheapest possible version of this is setting things up and ignoring them, which is a legitimate strategy and frequently the right one.

What does not backfill

The second catches people out. Search Console holds roughly sixteen months, which means a business that has never connected it has no search history at all and will have sixteen months at most once it does.

A worked example

A business preparing to change its website and wanting a baseline to judge the result against.

They had analytics, which had been installed correctly and never configured beyond pageviews.

Which meant they could compare traffic before and after, and could not compare enquiries, because no events had ever been set up.

The new site launched, traffic fell slightly and enquiries rose noticeably, and they had numbers for the first and impressions for the second.

Setting up two events the previous year would have taken half an hour and would have made the redesign's value demonstrable rather than debatable.

The conversation about whether the new site was working ran for months and could have been settled by a chart.

The things worth turning on now

Ordered by what each costs against what it eventually provides.

Search Console, which is free, takes ten minutes, and begins accumulating query data immediately. Almost nobody regrets this one.

Form and phone tap events, half an hour, and the only measurements connected to revenue.

A second analytics property, an hour, as insurance against a future switch.

And an enquiry spreadsheet, thirty seconds per enquiry, which is the most valuable record of the four and requires the most discipline.

All four together are an afternoon, and none of them requires you to look at anything afterwards.

Setting up and ignoring

Worth defending explicitly, because it sounds like doing something badly.

A tool collecting data nobody reads is not wasted. It is accumulating something that becomes valuable at the moment a question arises.

Which is a different proposition from actively using it, and it requires none of the ongoing effort that puts people off.

The mistake is concluding that because you will not read the reports, there is no point installing anything.

The reading is optional and the collecting is not recoverable, which is the whole distinction.

The version of this that costs money

Worth separating, since the argument does not extend to everything.

Paid tools with a monthly subscription are a different calculation, because collecting data you never read has a running cost rather than a one-off one.

Call tracking, heat mapping, session recording and rank monitoring all fall into this category, and all of them are frequently sold on the same historical-data argument.

For a small business the honest position is that these are worth paying for when a specific question needs answering, and not worth running speculatively for years.

The free tools are different precisely because the only cost is the hour, which is why the advice differs.

The counter-case

Where waiting is fine.

A business with no plans to change anything, no marketing spend to justify, and no interest in the question. Data has value only if a decision will eventually use it.

Anything requiring genuine ongoing effort rather than a one-off setup, where the maintenance cost is real and the benefit speculative.

And any tool with a subscription attached, where paying for a year of collection you will not read is a real cost rather than an hour.

The argument applies specifically to free things that install once and run unattended, which is most of what matters here.

The seasonal argument

The specific reason a year matters rather than three months.

Most small businesses have a shape to their year, and comparing October against September tells you about the calendar rather than about the business.

Which means the first genuinely useful comparison arrives twelve months after you started collecting, and not before.

A business that sets something up in January can say something meaningful the following January, and nothing much in between.

That is a long wait, and it is the reason to start now rather than when the question arrives, because the question always arrives before the data does.

Reconstructing what you can

Where history is already missing, some of it is partially recoverable.

Invoices and job records give you a monthly count of work won, going back as far as your accounts do, which is a better business record than traffic ever was.

Bank statements show the same thing at a coarser resolution.

A diary or calendar shows how busy periods were.

None of that tells you where enquiries came from, and it does establish the shape of the year, which is the most useful thing history provides.

Worth an afternoon assembling if a decision depends on it.

The date matters

A small habit that makes all of this interpretable.

Whenever you set something up, change something, or start doing something differently, write down the date.

A single document listing what changed and when turns every future chart from a shape into an explanation.

Without it, a rise in March is a mystery, and with it, it is the month the service pages went live.

That document costs nothing and it is the thing most businesses wish they had started.

This afternoon

  1. Connect Search Console.
  2. Add form and phone tap events.
  3. Create the second analytics property.
  4. Start the enquiry spreadsheet.
  5. Start a dated log of changes.
  6. Then go back to work.

The sixth is genuine. None of this requires attention afterwards, and the value arrives later without anybody doing anything in between.

What those events should record is covered in events instead of pageviews.


Frequently asked questions

What is the asymmetry?

Setting up a measurement tool costs an hour. Not having a year of history when you need it costs a year.

What does not backfill?

Analytics, event data, review counts and your enquiry record. Search Console holds a rolling window of roughly sixteen months rather than everything.

Is it worth installing something I will not read?

Yes. The reading is optional and the collecting is not recoverable. A tool accumulating data becomes valuable the moment a question arises.

What should I turn on now?

Search Console, form and phone tap events, a second analytics property, and an enquiry spreadsheet. All four are an afternoon.

Can I reconstruct missing history?

Partially. Invoices and job records give a monthly count of work won, which establishes the shape of the year even without knowing sources.

What is the most useful habit?

Writing down the date whenever you change something. It turns every future chart from a shape into an explanation.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Planning a website change with no baseline?

Half an hour of events set up now is the difference between demonstrating the result and arguing about it.

Start a Conversation