Expect a loss concentrated on informational queries and very little on queries where somebody is choosing a supplier. Measure your own exposure rather than accepting a general figure.

This is not a new question

Answer boxes, knowledge panels, and expanded question blocks have been sitting above ordinary results for years.

So there is a decade of experience about what happens to clicks when something else answers first, and it is more useful than speculation about what has just been announced.

The consistent finding is that the effect is real, varies enormously by query type, and is frequently overstated in general figures.

Which means the useful question is not how much traffic is lost but which of your traffic is exposed.

Where the loss concentrates

What does not lose much is anything where the person needs to choose, compare, or act. A summary of what a service costs still leaves somebody needing a supplier, and the summary cannot be that supplier.

Being the cited source is not nothing

And is not the same as a click, which is the honest middle position.

Where an answer names or links its sources, some proportion of readers follow through, and that proportion is smaller than the click rate for the same position previously.

Some who do not follow through still register the name, which has value in a local trade and none in a general one.

So a page that becomes a cited source rather than a clicked result has lost some traffic and gained some visibility.

Whether that trade is good depends entirely on whether your name being seen is worth anything, which for a local business it usually is.

Measure your own exposure

Rather than accepting a published figure.

In your search console, look at your top twenty queries and note the click rate for each.

Search a handful of them yourself and see what sits above the ordinary results.

Queries with something above them and a low click rate are where you are already losing, and that is measurable today.

Queries with nothing above them and a healthy click rate are your protected traffic.

Twenty minutes gives you a specific answer about your own site, which no general statistic can.

A worked example

A business went through their top twenty queries and found six had something answering above the results.

All six were general questions, all six had click rates well below their other queries, and between them they produced no enquiries at all.

The fourteen without anything above them included every query that produced work, all of which involved a place name, a price, or a specific problem.

Their exposure was concentrated entirely on traffic that had never converted.

They stopped worrying and put the effort into the fourteen.

That result is common enough to be worth checking for before assuming anything.

Position matters less when something is above you

A consequence worth understanding.

Being first is worth considerably less when the first thing on the page is not a result.

So effort spent moving from third to first on an informational query returns less than it did, while the same effort on a query with clean results returns as much as ever.

That changes where the effort should go rather than whether to make it.

Check what a result page looks like before deciding a phrase is worth pursuing, which takes one search.

Impressions rising with clicks falling

The pattern to watch for, since it is the signature.

If your position holds and your impressions hold and your clicks fall, something above you is answering the question.

That is different from a ranking drop, which shows position falling, and from a demand drop, which shows impressions falling.

Those three patterns need three different responses, and they are distinguishable in the same report.

Check it twice a year for your top pages, which is enough given how slowly this moves.

What to do about an exposed page

Since the answer is not to fight it.

Add the part that cannot be summarised: your price, your area, your judgement about when the general answer does not apply.

That gives somebody a reason to arrive even after reading a summary, and it makes the page a better citation.

Where a page is exposed and has never produced anything, leave it and spend the time elsewhere.

And where the general answer is the whole page, consider whether that page needed to exist at all rather than how to defend it.

Rank tracking becomes less informative

A practical consequence for anybody paying for a monthly report.

A report saying you hold position two says less than it did, because what sits above position two now varies by query and changes without notice.

Two queries where you rank second can deliver completely different traffic depending on whether an answer, a local block, or nothing occupies the space above.

So ask for click rate alongside position, which is available in the same data and is the figure that reflects what actually happened.

A supplier reporting positions without click rates is reporting the easier number rather than the useful one.

The counter-case

The effect could be larger than the past suggests.

A written summary covering a whole topic is a bigger intervention than a one-line answer box, and reasoning from previous behaviour may understate it.

Publishers of general information have a genuine exposure that a local trade does not, and dismissing their concern would be wrong.

And the arrangement being demonstrated now is not necessarily the one that ships, in either direction.

The honest position is that the range of outcomes is wide and your own click rates are the only evidence that will settle it for you.

Check your top twenty queries, note which already have something above them, and measure the pattern twice a year.

The twenty minutes

  1. List your top twenty queries.
  2. Note the click rate for each.
  3. Search a handful yourself.
  4. Note what sits above the results.
  5. Ask which produce enquiries.
  6. Add specifics to exposed pages that earn.
  7. Recheck twice a year.

Step five is the one that settles it, since exposure concentrated on queries that never produced work is a different situation from exposure on the queries that pay for the business.

Which content is exposed is covered in questions with one correct answer.


Frequently asked questions

Is this a new question?

No. Answer boxes and knowledge panels have sat above results for years, so there is a decade of experience about what happens to clicks when something answers first.

Where does the loss concentrate?

On definitions, conversions, single-figure answers, and general how-it-works questions. Queries where somebody needs to choose or act lose much less.

Is being cited worth anything?

Some. A proportion follow through, smaller than the previous click rate, and some register the name without following. For a local trade that has value.

How do I measure my own exposure?

List your top twenty queries with their click rates, search a handful yourself, and note which have something above the ordinary results.

What is the signature in the data?

Position holding, impressions holding, and clicks falling. That is different from a ranking drop, which shows position falling, and a demand drop, which shows impressions falling.

What should I do about an exposed page?

Add what cannot be summarised: your price, your area, your judgement about when the general answer does not apply. If it has never produced anything, leave it.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Worried about losing clicks to answers?

Check which of your top twenty queries already have something above them. It is usually the ones producing nothing.

Start a Conversation