Update a page when the information in it has become wrong, incomplete, or overtaken by events. Do not update it to change the date, which achieves nothing and eventually gets noticed. The most valuable updates add something that was not there before rather than rephrasing what already was.

Why updating beats writing new

An existing page has history. It has been crawled, assessed, possibly linked to, and it may already rank for something. A new page starts with none of that.

So improving a page that already has standing frequently produces more than publishing a new one on the same subject, and it avoids creating two pages competing for the same queries, which is the problem described in duplicate content.

This is one of the few areas where the cheaper option is also usually the better one.

What genuinely deserves updating

Facts that have changed

Prices, regulations, product names, platform features, figures. A page confidently stating something no longer true is worse than no page, because a reader who catches one error discounts everything else.

Advice that is now wrong

Distinct from facts. Guidance that was sound three years ago and has been overtaken. This is the most damaging kind of staleness because it is not obviously dated.

Gaps the page never covered

Questions readers ask that the page does not answer. Enquiry records and search queries both reveal these, and adding the missing section is usually the highest-value edit available.

Pages with impressions but few clicks

Search Console shows where you appear but are not chosen. Frequently the fix is the title and the opening rather than the body, since the page is being found and rejected rather than not found.

Broken links and dead references

Unglamorous maintenance. A page full of dead links reads as abandoned regardless of the quality of its writing.

What to leave alone

The date question

Two practices get conflated and only one is legitimate.

Reasonable: substantially revising a page and updating the modified date to reflect that. The date now tells a reader something true.

Not reasonable: changing dates on unmodified pages to appear current. It misleads readers, and any short-term benefit reverses when someone reads a supposedly current article containing obviously outdated advice.

Showing both an original publication date and a last-updated date is the honest arrangement, and it lets a reader judge for themselves.

How to do an update well

A workable cadence

Reviewing everything annually is unrealistic for most businesses and unnecessary. A more practical arrangement:

The alternative, updating nothing until a redesign forces a review, is how a site accumulates pages that quietly contradict each other.


Frequently asked questions

Is it better to update an old post or write a new one?

Usually to update, where the topic is the same. An existing page already has crawl history and possibly rankings and links, and publishing a second page on the same subject creates two pages competing for the same queries.

Does changing the date on a post improve rankings?

Changing dates on pages that have not been substantially revised is misleading and achieves nothing durable. Updating the modified date after a genuine revision is legitimate, and showing both original and updated dates lets readers judge for themselves.

Which pages are most worth updating?

Those containing facts that have changed, advice overtaken by events, gaps the page never addressed, and pages showing impressions but few clicks in Search Console, where the fix is frequently the title and opening rather than the body.

Should I change the URL when updating a page?

No. Keeping the address avoids the need for a redirect and the associated risk, even where the title and much of the content change. There is rarely a benefit that justifies altering a URL that already has history.

What should I leave alone?

Pages that already rank and convert, beyond correcting genuine errors, since the risk of change exceeds the likely benefit. Content that is honestly dated, such as a post about a past event, is historical rather than stale and can remain as it is.

How often should content be reviewed?

Pages containing prices, regulations, or platform specifics twice a year since those go wrong quietly, your most important pages annually whether or not anything appears wrong, and everything else when something such as a customer question reveals a gap.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. builds websites for businesses across Canada. Search and analytics platforms change frequently, and where practitioners genuinely disagree we have said so rather than presenting one position as settled.

Want someone to look at this with you?

We build and maintain websites for businesses across Canada, and we will take this off your plate entirely.

Start a Conversation