Unsubscribes as a Health Signal

The figure that is actually accurate

Open rates depend on images loading and now overstate. Click rates are affected by scanning systems that follow links automatically.

An unsubscribe is a deliberate act by a person, recorded when it happens, and it is one of the few email figures that means exactly what it appears to mean.

Which makes it more useful than its reputation suggests, because it is treated as a loss to be minimised rather than as information.

Read as a signal, it tells you about your content, your frequency, and where your addresses came from.

What normal looks like

A small steady trickle, in the region of a fraction of a percent per send, and it should be reasonably consistent from month to month.

On a list of four hundred that is one or two people per send, which sounds like nothing and is exactly the point: it is a background rate that does not move.

What matters is not the level but the stability, since your own normal is the only useful comparison and published benchmarks average across industries that are nothing like yours.

Establish your figure across a few sends, write it down, and treat departures from it as the signal rather than the number itself.

A spike, and what it means

• The content was not what people expected.
• The frequency increased without warning.
• The addresses came from somewhere questionable.
• A gap meant people had forgotten you.
• The tone shifted, usually toward selling.

The fourth is the most common and the most preventable: a list left dormant for months produces a departure spike on the next send from people who no longer recognise the sender.

Zero is a worse signal

The finding that surprises people, and it is the most useful thing in this subject.

A list producing no unsubscribes at all is not a list of unusually satisfied readers.

It usually means people are not reading closely enough to bother leaving, which is indifference rather than approval.

It can also mean the unsubscribe link is hard to find, in which case the people who wanted to leave are marking the message as junk instead, which damages your standing rather than merely reducing your list.

Complaints are considerably more harmful than departures, and a hidden unsubscribe link converts the first into the second.

A visible link and a small steady departure rate is the healthy arrangement.

Watch the complaint rate alongside

Because the two together tell you more than either alone.

Complaints are people marking your message as junk, and mail providers weight them heavily.

Departures rising while complaints stay flat is people self-selecting out, which is fine and arguably good.

Complaints rising is a problem regardless of what departures do, and it points at consent rather than content: people who do not believe they signed up.

Both figures are reported by any mailing service, and the complaint rate is the one to act on first.

A worked example

A business had a stable departure rate of one or two per send across a year.

One month it jumped to seventeen, with three complaints.

That message had been the first in eleven weeks, after a gap caused by a busy period, and it had promoted a service they had not mentioned before.

So it arrived from a half-forgotten sender, saying something unfamiliar, after a long silence.

They went back to monthly sending and the rate returned to normal within two sends.

Their useful conclusion was that the gap had caused it rather than the content, and that consistency was protecting something they had not realised it was protecting.

Look at who left

The step nobody takes, and it takes two minutes.

Most tools let you see which addresses unsubscribed and when they joined.

People leaving within the first two messages usually signed up expecting something different, which points at how you are describing the list at signup.

People leaving after two years are ordinary attrition and require no action.

And a cluster from one source, such as everybody added from a particular event, tells you something about that source rather than about your content.

That last pattern is worth knowing before you collect addresses the same way again.

Do not try to prevent them

A caution, since a rising figure invites intervention.

The instinct is to make leaving harder, send less often, or soften the content, and all three make things worse.

Somebody who wants to leave and cannot will complain instead, which costs you far more than the departure.

Sending less often means being forgotten, which produces a larger spike later.

And softening the content to avoid departures produces a message that says nothing, which is how a list becomes unreadable and then unread.

Let the people who do not want it go, and pay attention to the rate rather than the individuals.

Ask why on the way out

An option worth considering, with a caution attached.

Some tools can show a short page after somebody unsubscribes, asking why in one question with three or four options.

A minority answer, and the answers are useful precisely because they come from people with no reason to be polite: too often, not relevant, never signed up.

Keep it to one optional question on the page after the unsubscribe has already taken effect, never as a step before it.

Anything that delays leaving, or asks somebody to confirm twice, converts a departure into a complaint, which is the outcome this whole subject exists to avoid.

The counter-case

The signal is weak on a very small list.

At a hundred subscribers, one or two departures is the entire measurement, and the difference between a good month and a bad one is a single person changing jobs.

Reading a rate from those numbers is exactly the small-sample problem that applies to everything else at this scale.

There is also a version of this where a business becomes so relaxed about departures that it stops noticing a list shrinking steadily toward nothing.

Track the count as well as the rate, watch complaints closely at any size, and treat a spike as a question rather than a verdict.

What to do

1. Record your normal rate across a few sends.
2. Treat departures from it as the signal.
3. Watch complaints alongside, and act on those first.
4. Treat zero as a warning, not a success.
5. Check the unsubscribe link is easy to find.
6. Look at when leavers joined.
7. Do not send less often in response.

Step four is the counterintuitive one, since a list with no departures is usually a list nobody is reading rather than one everybody likes.

Making the link easy is covered in the unsubscribe link you should make easy.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.