Short Video for a Business That Hates Cameras

The assumption in the advice

Almost every recommendation about short video assumes a person speaking to a camera, comfortably, with reasonable delivery.

A great many capable business owners will not do that, and it is not a failure of confidence to decline.

Some people are poor on camera and know it, and the resulting video is worse than none because awkwardness reads as a lack of confidence in the work.

The useful point is that the presenter is not the requirement. For a trade or a service, the work is more interesting than the person doing it.

Formats needing nobody on camera

• Before and after, two clips, no words.
• A process, filmed in progress and sped up.
• A close detail of something being done well.
• A problem shown, with a caption explaining it.
• Hands working, which is genuinely watchable.
• A finished job panned slowly.

The fifth is the one people underestimate. Footage of somebody's hands doing skilled work holds attention better than most talking, and requires no performance from anybody.

The voice can come later

The compromise for anybody who wants to explain something without appearing.

Film the work silently, then record a voice over it afterwards, reading from a written note.

That removes almost everything people find difficult: no eye contact, no worrying about appearance, and as many attempts as you want.

Speaking over footage of your own work is also easier than speaking to a lens, because you are describing something in front of you rather than performing.

Where even that is unwelcome, captions carry the explanation and the video works silently, which suits how most people watch anyway.

Captions do more work than sound

Worth knowing, since it changes what matters in production.

A large share of video is watched without sound, particularly in a feed, so a video whose meaning depends on audio reaches a fraction of the people who see it.

Captions or on-screen text carry it instead, and they let a silent video be fully understood.

Which means the effort belongs in the text rather than in the audio, and a business that cannot produce good audio is not disadvantaged.

Keep the text short, put it where the platform's own interface will not cover it, and check it on a phone before publishing.

A worked example

A landscaping business had been told repeatedly to post video and had not, because neither of the two people involved would appear on camera.

They started filming with a phone propped against something: the ground before starting, a few clips during the day, and a slow pan at the end.

No faces, no speaking, captions added afterwards saying what was happening and roughly how long it took.

Those performed considerably better than the photographs they had been posting, and one reached well beyond their usual audience.

The most watched clip was two minutes of a wall being built, sped up, with four words of caption.

Nobody involved had to do anything they were uncomfortable with, and the filming added a few minutes to a day they were already having.

Filming while working

The practical constraint, since nobody has time to produce video as a separate task.

Prop the phone somewhere stable and let it run, then take the useful ten seconds afterwards.

Film more than you need, because the alternative is returning to a site, which never happens.

Wipe the lens, which is the single most common reason a clip is unusable for a trade.

Shoot in the orientation the platform uses, which is upright for most short video, and decide before rather than cropping afterwards.

And take the before shot on arrival, as routine, because it cannot be taken later and it is what makes the after shot mean anything.

Good enough is genuinely good enough

The reassurance, and it is not merely encouragement.

Short video from a small business is expected to look like a phone, and polished production frequently performs worse because it reads as advertising rather than as something real.

Shaky footage of actual work is more persuasive than a smooth video of somebody describing work.

Which means the barrier is lower than it appears and the equipment argument is a distraction.

The things worth getting right are light, a clean lens, holding still, and the caption. Everything else can be poor without mattering.

Use it in more than one place

Since the filming is the effort and the publishing is not.

The same clip works on your site, on a listing, in an email, and in a quote.

A short video of similar work attached to a quote is unusual enough to be remembered, and it answers the question a customer cannot ask, which is whether you are any good.

Keep the originals somewhere organised rather than only on a phone, since the archive is what makes future use possible.

Name them by job and date, which takes seconds and makes them findable a year later.

The counter-case

Video is not obligatory.

Plenty of trades do perfectly well with photographs, which are faster to produce, easier to use, and adequate for showing finished work.

Video also demands a rhythm of publishing that a business posting occasionally will not sustain, and the platforms rewarding it most are the ones most punishing of inconsistency.

And for some work there is genuinely nothing to watch, since the process is neither visible nor interesting.

Film if the work is visual and the filming can happen while working. If it cannot, photographs and a written answer to a common question will serve you better than reluctant video.

Starting

1. Film the work, not a person.
2. Take a before shot on arrival, always.
3. Prop the phone and let it run.
4. Wipe the lens first.
5. Add captions rather than relying on sound.
6. Record a voice over later if you want one.
7. Store and name the originals.

Step two is the one that cannot be recovered, and a before shot taken in ten seconds is what turns an ordinary finished photograph into something worth watching.

Making video understandable without sound is covered in a video with no captions.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.