Schedule content that is true whenever it appears, keep anything time-sensitive manual, and check the queue whenever something significant happens locally.

What scheduling solves

The main obstacle to consistent posting, which is remembering at the moment.

An hour once a quarter produces six weeks of posts, which then appear without anybody doing anything.

Which converts a fortnightly obligation into an occasional session, and for most people that is the difference between a page that survives and one that does not.

It also means posts appear at sensible times rather than at eleven at night when the paperwork was finally done.

What it creates

The first is the one that does real damage and it is entirely avoidable, since it requires only that somebody checks the queue when something happens.

What to schedule and what not to

The distinction that makes this safe.

Schedule anything true whenever it appears: a completed job, a common question answered, seasonal advice, a recommendation.

Do not schedule anything referring to now: the weather, an event, a current situation, availability this week.

Which is a simple test, and applying it means a queue can sit for six weeks without becoming wrong.

The one exception worth making: seasonal posts scheduled for a month ahead are usually fine, since a warning about winter is not wrong in mid-December.

A worked example

A business with a month of posts scheduled, during which a serious local incident occurred.

A scheduled post about a completed job appeared the following morning, among a feed of people discussing what had happened.

It read as oblivious, which it was, and somebody said so in the comments.

The business paused the queue, replied briefly, and resumed a week later.

Nothing lasting came of it and the response taught them the necessary habit, which was checking the queue whenever anything significant happened locally.

That check takes under a minute and prevents the entire category of problem.

The pause habit

The whole of what makes scheduling safe.

When something significant happens locally or nationally, open the scheduler and pause it.

Not delete, since the posts remain valid later. Pause.

Which requires only that somebody remembers the queue exists, and that is the part that fails.

A note in the calendar, or an association with checking the news, is enough to establish it.

Judging what counts as significant is a matter of local knowledge rather than a rule, and erring towards pausing costs nothing.

Which tool

Less important than the habit, and worth a short note.

Most platforms include their own scheduling, free, within the page management tools.

That is sufficient for a single page and avoids paying for anything or granting access to a third party.

Paid tools become worthwhile where several platforms are managed together, where more than one person is involved, or where a calendar view genuinely helps.

For a business posting fortnightly to one page, the built-in scheduler does everything required and the paid options are solving a problem that does not exist.

Sounding like a person

The other objection to scheduling, and it is largely a writing question rather than a scheduling one.

Scheduled posts sound automated when they are written in a batch, in a uniform voice, about nothing in particular.

They sound like a person when each is about a specific job, in a specific place, with a detail only somebody who was there would include.

Which means the fix is in the writing rather than the timing, and a well-written scheduled post is indistinguishable from a live one.

Writing six at once encourages uniformity, so it is worth deliberately varying them and writing each from the actual job rather than from a template.

Posting times

The setting people spend most time on and which matters least.

Advice about optimal posting times is abundant and mostly derived from data about very different businesses.

For a page with a small local audience, the effect of posting at one hour rather than another is negligible compared with whether the post is any good.

What is worth avoiding: the middle of the night, and posting several times within an hour after a scheduling error.

Beyond that, a consistent time is worth more than an optimal one, and any evening or lunchtime slot works fine.

Where posting live is better.

Anything current, obviously, including availability, weather-driven work, and responses to local events.

A business whose page is genuinely conversational, where the audience expects presence rather than publication.

And any period where something is developing, when scheduled content should be paused entirely.

For a trade posting job photographs and useful advice fortnightly, none of those applies most of the time, and scheduling is straightforwardly better than not posting.

Seeing the queue

A small practical habit that catches most of the remaining problems.

Before scheduling, read the queue in order, as somebody following the page would encounter it.

Which reveals repetition, three job photographs in a row, or two posts making the same point differently.

It also catches anything that will have become wrong by the date it publishes, such as a reference to availability or a season.

Two minutes at the end of the scheduling session, and it is the only quality check the process needs.

Replies still need a person

The limit worth being clear about.

Scheduling handles publication and nothing else.

Comments and messages still require somebody, within a day, and a page that publishes reliably and never replies is worse than one that does neither.

Which means notifications need to be switched on and somebody needs to be looking at them.

The failure mode is a page that appears active and does not respond, and anybody who messages it and hears nothing concludes something about the business as a whole.

Setting it up

  1. Write six posts in one session.
  2. Check each is true whenever it appears.
  3. Schedule them across six weeks.
  4. Turn on notifications for replies.
  5. Pause the queue when anything significant happens.
  6. Keep anything current out of the queue.

The fifth is the only habit this requires and it is the one that prevents every scheduling failure worth worrying about.

Where the content comes from is covered in what to post when nothing happened.


Frequently asked questions

What does scheduling solve?

Remembering at the moment. An hour once a quarter produces six weeks of posts, which for most people is the difference between a page surviving and not.

What problems does it create?

Tone-deaf timing during a local incident, stale content, nobody watching for replies, visible repetition, and a generic voice.

What should I schedule?

Anything true whenever it appears: completed jobs, common questions, seasonal advice. Not the weather, an event, or availability this week.

How do I avoid posting during an incident?

Pause the queue rather than deleting it. That check takes under a minute and prevents the entire category of problem.

How do I avoid sounding automated?

That is a writing question rather than a scheduling one. Posts sound like a person when each is about a specific job with a detail only somebody there would include.

What does scheduling not handle?

Replies. A page that publishes reliably and never responds is worse than one doing neither, so notifications need to be on and watched.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Six weeks of posts queued?

Add one habit: pause the queue when something happens locally. That is the whole of what makes scheduling safe.

Start a Conversation