Businesses that accumulate reviews steadily have made asking a step in the job rather than a decision someone makes. That means a fixed trigger point, a named person responsible, a way to track who has been asked, and a single follow-up. Without those four it depends on memory, and memory loses to a busy week.

Why good intentions fail here

Almost every business intends to ask for reviews. The ones that have hundreds are not more committed, they have removed the decision.

When asking is something to remember at the end of a job, it competes with loading the van, the next appointment, and the invoice. It loses most weeks. When it is a line on the job sheet, it happens.

That is the whole difference, and it is operational rather than motivational.

The trigger point

Pick one moment and always use it. Three work well and they suit different businesses.

At completion, in person

Highest response rate, because goodwill is at its peak and you are standing there. It requires whoever is on site to do it, which is a training matter rather than a system one.

With the invoice

Convenient because the invoice already goes out reliably, and slightly awkward because it arrives alongside a request for money. Works better as a line in the email than in the invoice itself.

A few days after

Frequently the best balance. The work has settled, any immediate problem has surfaced, and the message arrives on its own rather than attached to a bill. It requires a system to send it, which is where most businesses stall.

Who is responsible

One named person, not everyone.

Where it is everyone's job it is nobody's. Whether that is the person on site, the office, or the owner, the useful thing is that one role owns it and it appears on their list rather than in general expectations.

For businesses with crews, the practical split is that the person on site mentions it verbally and the office sends the link. The verbal mention roughly doubles the response to the message that follows, because the customer is expecting it.

Making it one tap

The gap between intending to leave a review and doing so is where most of them are lost, and every step in between costs you a share.

A direct link to the review form, sent by text or email, removes the searching. Asking someone to look you up and find the review section is asking for three steps, and a proportion will not complete them.

Text generally outperforms email for this, because the link is tapped on the device the review will be written on, and the customer is not switching context.

Tracking, which is what makes it a system

A simple record of who has been asked, when, and whether they left one.

That does three things. It stops the same customer being asked twice, which is irritating. It shows the actual response rate, which is the number that tells you whether the process is working. And it identifies who has not been asked, which is where the recoverable reviews are.

A column on the job sheet is sufficient. This does not need software, and the businesses that add software before adding the habit generally end up with neither.

One follow-up, then stop

Most people who intend to leave a review do not get to it, and a single reminder recovers a meaningful share of them.

Once, about a week later, briefly. Beyond that it becomes pestering, and pestering a satisfied customer is a way to make them less satisfied.

The reminder should be easy to ignore. If they do not respond to the second message, that is the answer.

What to measure

NumberWhat it tells you
Jobs completedThe denominator. Without it the rest means nothing
Customers askedWhether the habit is actually happening
Reviews receivedThe response rate to the ask

The gap between jobs and asks is a process problem, fixable by making the trigger firmer. The gap between asks and reviews is a friction problem, fixable by shortening the path. They have different remedies, which is why both numbers are worth having.

Why steady beats bursts

Recency matters, so a consistent trickle reads better than a batch. A profile with reviews arriving monthly for two years looks like an operating business; forty reviews in one week looks exactly like what it is.

Steady accumulation is also the only real protection against an unfair review, since one poor review among sixty is an outlier and the same review among four is a pattern. That defence has to be built before it is needed, which is the argument in responding to a review that is not accurate.

Frequently asked questions

Why do review requests stop happening?

Because they depend on someone remembering at the end of a job, competing with loading the van and the next appointment. Businesses with hundreds of reviews have made it a step rather than a decision.

When is the best time to ask?

At completion in person gets the highest response. A few days afterwards is often the best balance, since the work has settled and the message is not attached to an invoice.

Who should be responsible for asking?

One named person. Where it is everyone's job it is nobody's. For crews, the practical split is the person on site mentioning it verbally and the office sending the link.

How do I make it easy for customers?

Send a direct link to the review form, ideally by text. Asking someone to look you up and find the review section adds three steps, and a proportion will not complete them.

Should I follow up if they do not leave one?

Once, about a week later, briefly and easy to ignore. Most people who intended to leave a review simply did not get to it, and a single reminder recovers a meaningful share.

What should I track?

Jobs completed, customers asked, and reviews received. The gap between jobs and asks is a process problem; the gap between asks and reviews is a friction problem, and they have different fixes.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Plenty of happy customers and hardly any reviews?

We build the ask into your job process with a trigger, an owner, and a tracked follow-up, so it stops depending on anyone remembering.

Start a Conversation