A visitor looks at photographs to answer practical worries: whether you are real, whether the work is tidy, whether you have done their specific job, and what your crew will be like in their home. Portfolio shots answer only the last of those.

What a visitor is looking for

Not aesthetic appreciation. Evidence.

They are checking whether you exist, whether the work is competent, whether you have done something resembling their situation, and what it will be like having you there.

A gallery of perfectly lit finished kitchens answers the second question and none of the others, which is why sites with beautiful photography frequently convert no better than sites with plain photography.

The photographs that do the work

Before and after, same angle

The most persuasive format available in most trades, and the one that requires remembering to take the first shot.

What makes it work is the same angle. Two photographs from different positions invite the suspicion they are different properties.

The mess, controlled

Dust sheets down, floors protected, tools organised. This answers the question homeowners actually worry about, which is what their house will be like during the work.

Almost nobody photographs this and it addresses a real hesitation.

The site left clean at the end of a day

Not the finished job. The state you leave things in when the work is unfinished, which is what a customer lives with for a fortnight.

Your people, faces visible

Somebody letting strangers into their home wants to know who is arriving. A photograph of the crew does more for that than any statement about vetting.

The vehicle, in a recognisable place

A signwritten van outside a street somebody local recognises does two things at once: proves you are real and proves you work here.

The problem, mid-diagnosis

A photograph of the thing that had gone wrong, with an explanation. This demonstrates competence in a way a finished result cannot, because the finished result looks the same whoever did it.

What stock photography costs you

Worth being specific rather than simply asserting it is worse.

A stock image of a tradesperson gives the visitor no information. Worse, it is frequently the same image a competitor is using, and a visitor who has opened three tabs occasionally notices.

The deeper cost is that photography is the one place a small local business can obviously outperform a large one. A national operator cannot show your van on your streets. Choosing stock discards that advantage voluntarily.

Where stock is genuinely fine: decorative backgrounds, abstract images, and anything not claiming to depict your work.

Quality, and how much is enough

Less than people assume, and there is a floor.

A recent phone camera in daylight is sufficient for almost everything above. What matters is the photograph being level, in focus, well lit, and showing the thing it is meant to show.

What falls below the floor: photographs taken in the dark, blurred, at an angle, with a finger in the frame, or so low resolution they look pixelated. Those actively harm, because they suggest carelessness about detail in a business whose selling point is care about detail.

The practical fix is taking six photographs instead of one and discarding five.

Permission

Necessary and frequently skipped.

A photograph of work at somebody's property involves their home, and the courteous and safer position is to ask before publishing, particularly where anything identifiable appears.

Asking at the end of a job, when the customer is pleased, gets agreement almost every time. Asking six months later is harder.

Avoid publishing anything showing a security arrangement, a house number alongside a description of what is inside, or a vehicle registration.

Where they go

Distributed rather than gathered.

A gallery page is where photographs go to be ignored. Photographs placed on the relevant service page, beside the text describing that work, are seen by the person deciding about that work.

The same applies to quotes and proposals, where a photograph of similar completed work does more than another paragraph of description.

The habit that makes this possible

One photograph before, one during, and two at the end of every job.

Four photographs, thirty seconds, and after a year the business has a genuine library rather than a scramble for something usable when the site is being built.

That accumulation is worth more than a single professional shoot, because it covers the range of work actually done rather than the four jobs that happened to be photogenic, and it is the same slow accumulation that produces everything else durable in reputation as an asset you build slowly.

Frequently asked questions

What are visitors actually looking for in photographs?

Evidence rather than aesthetics: whether you exist, whether the work is competent, whether you have done their situation, and what it will be like having you there.

Which photographs persuade most?

Before and after from the same angle, the controlled mess with dust sheets down, the site left clean at the end of a day, your people, your vehicle locally, and the problem mid-diagnosis.

Why does the same angle matter for before and after?

Two photographs from different positions invite the suspicion they are different properties, which undoes the point of showing them.

What does stock photography actually cost?

Information, since it tells the visitor nothing, and the one advantage a local business has over a national operator, which cannot show your van on your streets.

How good do the photographs need to be?

A recent phone camera in daylight is enough if the shot is level, focused, and lit. Blurred or dark photographs actively harm, since they suggest carelessness about detail.

Where should photographs go?

On the relevant service page beside the text describing that work, and in quotes. A gallery page is where photographs go to be ignored.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Gallery of finished jobs and nothing showing what the work is like to live with?

We work out which photographs answer the questions your visitors are actually asking, and where on the site they belong.

Start a Conversation