One Number to Watch Next Year

Why one

A dashboard of twelve figures is built with enthusiasm, opened twice, and abandoned by March.

The reason is not laziness, it is that twelve numbers require interpretation and interpretation requires an hour nobody has.

One number takes ten seconds, gets checked, and produces a question when it moves.

A number that is actually watched is worth more than a better number that is not, which is the whole argument.

Choosing it

• Close to money, not to activity.
• Countable without effort.
• Moved by things you control.
• Not seasonal beyond comparison.
• Understood by everybody involved.

The first is the one people get wrong. Visits, followers, and impressions are activity, and a year of watching them tells you very little about whether the business is better.

What most small businesses should pick

Since the honest answer is usually the same.

Enquiries per month, counted consistently, including calls.

It is close to money, it moves when marketing works, and it is countable if somebody writes them down.

For a shop, orders per month or average order value serves the same purpose.

For a business with few, large jobs, quotes sent or quotes accepted is better, since monthly revenue is too lumpy to read.

Whichever it is, define it once in writing, since a number counted differently in March than in January is not a series.

Write it down where you will see it

Because the recording is what makes it a series rather than a glance.

One line per month, in the same place, for the whole year.

A spreadsheet, a notebook, or a wall chart all work, and the medium matters less than it being somewhere you pass.

Add one line of context each month: what was happening, what you changed, what was unusual.

That context is what makes the figure interpretable a year later, when nobody remembers why March was quiet.

Two minutes a month is the entire commitment.

A worked example

A business had a reporting dashboard with fourteen figures that nobody had opened since the spring.

They replaced it with one number, enquiries per month including calls, written in a notebook with a line about what had happened.

By September the pattern was clear enough to act on: two quiet months both followed months where nothing had been published or sent.

They had never seen that connection in the dashboard, which showed it and buried it among everything else.

The following year they kept the number and added a second, which was as many as they could actually watch.

Count it the same way every time

A discipline worth stating, since a series is only useful if the definition holds.

Decide whether a repeat enquiry from the same person counts once or twice, whether a wrong number counts at all, and whether a supplier calling counts as an enquiry.

None of those answers is right or wrong and all of them have to be the same in November as they were in February.

Write the definition down beside the number rather than relying on whoever counts remembering it, particularly where more than one person records them.

A figure counted loosely for a year is not a series, and the drift is invisible until somebody notices that two years cannot be compared.

Compare against last year, not last month

Since month-to-month movement is mostly noise and season.

The useful question is whether this January is better than the previous January, which needs twelve months before it can be asked.

Which is an argument for starting now rather than waiting for a better system, since the value arrives only after a year.

Until then, resist reading meaning into monthly movement, which is where most people abandon the exercise.

A quiet month is a quiet month, and only the pattern across a year is information.

Decide what would make you act

In advance, since a number without a threshold is a fact rather than a tool.

Something like: two consecutive months below a figure means we look at what changed.

That converts watching into a decision rule, and it stops both over-reacting to one bad month and ignoring a genuine decline for a quarter.

Write the threshold down alongside the number, and agree who looks when it triggers.

Without it, the number gets recorded faithfully and acted on never, which is a common and pointless outcome.

Keep the second number for later

Since the temptation to add is immediate.

Add a second only once the first has been recorded every month for a year without being missed.

The natural second is the one that explains the first: if enquiries are the number, then where they came from is the explanation.

Two is the practical maximum for most small businesses, and a third is how this becomes a dashboard again.

The constraint is not what is measurable, it is what somebody will actually look at every month for years.

Tell everybody what it is

Since a number known only to the owner changes nothing about how anybody works.

Say what the number is, why it was chosen, and what it was last month, to whoever is involved in the business.

That gives people something to move rather than a general instruction to do better, and it is remarkable how often somebody suggests a change once they know what is being watched.

Put it somewhere visible rather than in a document, since a figure on a wall is looked at and a figure in a folder is not.

And say plainly that it is not a target anybody is judged against, because a number used that way stops being measured honestly.

The counter-case

One number is a simplification and simplifications mislead.

Enquiries can rise while quality falls, and a business optimising one figure will eventually damage something the figure does not see.

Some businesses also genuinely need more, particularly anything with several distinct lines that move independently.

And the number is not a substitute for talking to customers, which tells you things no measurement will.

Pick one close to money, define it in writing, record it monthly with context, and set a threshold that means act.

Setting it up

1. Pick one number close to money.
2. Define it in writing, once.
3. Include calls if it is enquiries.
4. Record it monthly, same place.
5. Add one line of context.
6. Set the threshold that means act.
7. Compare against last year, not last month.

Step five is what makes the series readable, since a column of figures without any note of what was happening cannot be interpreted a year later by anybody.

Why a ratio can mislead is covered in conversion rate as a misleading number.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.