Decide the one thing you want somebody to do, ask for it clearly, and remove or subordinate everything else. Additional links compete with the action rather than adding to it.

What happens with four

A typical small business newsletter asks the reader to book a service, read an article, follow a social account, and leave a review.

Each is reasonable and each was added because it seemed a shame to waste the opportunity.

The result is that the reader has to choose, choosing takes effort, and the easiest resolution is to close the message.

So four requests reliably produce fewer completed actions than one, which is counterintuitive enough that businesses keep adding the fourth.

Why more asks produce less

Two mechanisms, and they compound.

Attention divides. A reader who would have booked now considers whether to read the article instead, and deferring both is easier than deciding.

And clarity falls. A message with one purpose can be understood in a glance; a message with four requires reading to work out what it is for.

The second is the larger effect for a small business, because most readers are deciding whether to engage at all rather than choosing between offers.

A message that cannot be summarised in a sentence has already lost most of its readers.

Deciding which one

The uncomfortable part, since it means dropping things that seemed worth including.

Ask what you would want if the reader did exactly one thing.

For most small businesses that is contact, in whatever form: a booking, a call, a reply, a quote request.

Reading an article is a means rather than an end, and following a social account is a means to a means.

Where the honest answer is that this month you want people to read something rather than to buy, that is a legitimate single action and the message should be built around it.

What is not legitimate is refusing to choose, which is what a four-link message represents.

Subordinate rather than delete

The third is the practical rule: a message may contain several links and only one of them should look like a button, because a button is a visual instruction and two buttons are two instructions.

Repeat the one action

A distinction worth making, since one action does not mean one mention.

Stating the same request twice, once early and once at the end, is not competing with itself and it catches readers who decide at different points.

Early for the ones who were already persuaded, and at the end for the ones who needed the argument first.

Use the same wording both times rather than varying it, since two phrasings of the same request read as two requests.

Three mentions in a short message starts to read as pressure, so twice is the practical limit for most small business messages.

A worked example

A business sent a monthly message containing a seasonal offer, a link to a recent article, a request for reviews, and their social accounts.

Clicks were spread thinly across all four and bookings from the message were rare.

They rewrote it around the offer alone: the offer explained, one button, the same request repeated at the end, and their phone number.

The article, the review request, and the social links were removed entirely rather than moved.

Total clicks fell, because there were fewer things to click.

Bookings from the message roughly tripled, which was the outcome they were measuring for and the reason total clicks had been a misleading number.

Rotate rather than combine

The answer to the objection that the other things still need saying.

They do, in other messages.

A business sending monthly has twelve messages a year, which is twelve single actions rather than one message with twelve requests.

Ask for reviews in one, promote the article in another, and make the seasonal offer in a third.

That also produces better messages, since each can be written properly around its purpose rather than as a paragraph competing for space.

Keep a short list of the things you want to ask for and work through it, which removes the temptation to include everything each time.

Say what happens next

A small addition that lifts completion.

People hesitate at a request when they cannot picture what follows: whether they will be committed, how long it takes, whether somebody will telephone them.

One sentence resolves it. Takes about a minute, no obligation, and we will confirm by email within the day.

That is more effective than making the button larger and it costs a line.

Where the next step is genuinely off-putting, such as a long form, saying so honestly still performs better than concealing it, because the surprise is what causes abandonment.

Give the action somewhere sensible to land

The half of this that happens after the click, and it is where a good message frequently fails.

A message about a seasonal boiler service that links to the homepage asks the reader to find the thing again, which a proportion will not.

Link to the specific page, and make sure that page repeats the offer in the same words, so somebody arriving recognises they are in the right place.

Where no such page exists, that is worth ten minutes to create rather than a reason to link to the homepage.

The message and the page it points at are one thing, and testing the whole path rather than the link is what catches a mismatch between them.

The counter-case

One action is a default rather than a rule.

Some messages are genuinely informational, such as a notice of closure dates, and forcing a call to action onto them is worse than having none.

A message to a segmented list where different readers plainly need different things can reasonably offer two, provided they are alternatives rather than additions.

And a long-form message with distinct sections, sent to a readership that expects it, works differently from a short one.

Decide the purpose, ask for the thing that serves it, and let the message be short enough that the request is obvious.

Before sending

  1. Name the one thing you want done.
  2. Remove the other requests rather than moving them.
  3. Use one button, not several.
  4. Repeat the same request at the end.
  5. Say what happens next in one sentence.
  6. Keep contact details available regardless.
  7. Put the removed items on a list for future messages.

Step two is the difficult one, and moving something lower is not the same as removing it, since a second button competes wherever it sits.

Getting a response rather than a click is covered in writing an email somebody replies to.

Frequently asked questions

Why does asking for four things produce less?

Because attention divides and clarity falls. A reader who would have booked now considers the alternatives, and deferring everything is easier than deciding.

How do I choose which action?

Ask what you would want if the reader did exactly one thing. For most small businesses that is contact in some form. Reading an article is a means rather than an end.

Can I mention the action more than once?

Yes. Once early and once at the end catches readers who decide at different points. Use the same wording both times, since two phrasings read as two requests.

What about the other things I wanted to say?

Put them in other messages. Twelve monthly messages is twelve single actions rather than one message with twelve requests, and each gets written properly.

Should secondary links be removed or moved?

Removed, mostly. Moving something lower does not stop it competing, and a second button is a second instruction wherever it sits.

What lifts completion beyond the button?

One sentence saying what happens next: how long it takes, whether it commits them, and when they will hear back. That does more than making the button larger.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Newsletter with four links in it?

Pick the one you actually want done and delete the rest. Total clicks fall and completed actions rise.

Start a Conversation