A logo needs to be legible small, work in one colour, be recognisable at a glance, and exist in file formats you can actually use. Distinctiveness matters less than those four, and cleverness matters least of all.

The four jobs

Be legible small. It will appear as a favicon, a social avatar, and a line on an invoice more often than it appears large.

Work in one colour. Embroidery, engraving, a stamp, a single-colour print, and a black and white fax of an invoice all exist.

Be recognisable quickly. On a moving vehicle, on a sign, in a list of search results.

Exist in usable files. Which is where most small businesses discover their logo is a problem.

Distinctiveness is desirable and comes fifth. A plain logo that does the four things outperforms a striking one that does not.

The small-size test

The most common failure, and it is easy to check.

Reduce your logo to about the size of a fingernail and look at it. If the words become illegible, if a thin line disappears, or if a detailed element turns to mush, it fails at the size it will most often be seen.

What causes it: thin strokes, tight spacing, small secondary text such as a tagline or an established date, and elements with fine internal detail.

The usual fix is a simplified version for small use, which is a legitimate and standard approach rather than an admission of failure.

The one-colour test

Convert it to solid black on white and see whether it still reads.

Logos relying on colour to separate elements collapse here. So do gradients, which either band badly or disappear entirely, and drop shadows, which reproduce as smudges.

This matters practically. Workwear embroidery, vehicle vinyl, stamps, and etched signage frequently want a single colour, and a logo that only exists in full colour costs money every time somebody has to redraw it.

The files you actually need

The part that causes the most trouble later, and the part most small businesses never receive.

Without the vector file, every future use requires either redrawing or accepting a blurry version. A business holding only a low-resolution image of its own logo is a business that will pay somebody to recreate it.

If you commissioned a logo and received only image files, ask for the source. It is reasonable to expect it and awkward to request years later.

Ownership and licensing

Two things worth settling at the point of commissioning.

Whether you own the logo outright or hold a licence to use it, which differs between designers and should be in writing.

And whether the typeface is licensed for your uses. Fonts are licensed rather than owned, and a licence covering a designer's use may not cover yours across signage, merchandise, and print. Where a logo's lettering has been converted to shapes, that concern largely disappears for the logo itself while remaining for any other use of the same font.

What a logo does not have to do

Worth saying, because these expectations produce bad logos.

Explain the business. A logo identifies rather than describes. The name and the words around it do the explaining.

Contain a clever hidden element. Nobody notices, and the pursuit of it usually costs legibility.

Include your services. A logo with a phone number, a web address, and three service lines is a small advertisement rather than a mark.

Be timeless. A logo that is legible and simple ages fine. Chasing timelessness produces something generic.

The realistic route for a small business

Three options, honestly.

A designer, which produces the files and the reasoning, and costs the most.

A well-set wordmark, meaning your name in a good typeface with careful spacing. This is genuinely sufficient for many businesses, it passes all four tests easily, and it is the cheapest thing that works.

Templates, which are quick and produce something you may share with other businesses, and which frequently do not include the vector file.

The middle option is underrated. A clear name, set well, in one or two colours, is a better outcome than an ambitious mark that fails the small-size test, and it is far easier to live with than a logo you eventually replace, which is a decision with its own costs, as covered in knowing when a rebrand is justified.

Frequently asked questions

What does a logo actually need to do?

Be legible small, work in one colour, be recognisable at a glance, and exist in usable files. Distinctiveness comes fifth and cleverness matters least.

How do I test whether it works small?

Reduce it to about fingernail size. If the words become illegible or a thin line disappears, it fails at the size it will most often be seen.

Why does one-colour matter?

Workwear embroidery, vehicle vinyl, stamps, and etched signage frequently want a single colour, and a logo that only exists in full colour costs money every time.

Which files should I have?

A vector master, full colour plus one-colour black and white versions, transparent background, a simplified small-use mark, common raster sizes, and the colour and typeface details written down.

What if I only have an image file?

Ask the designer for the source. Without a vector version every future use means redrawing or accepting a blurry logo, and requesting it years later is awkward.

Is a plain wordmark good enough?

For many small businesses, yes. Your name in a good typeface with careful spacing passes all four tests easily and is the cheapest thing that actually works.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Only have a low-resolution image of your own logo?

We work out what files you are missing and produce the versions you will need for signage, workwear, and print.

Start a Conversation