It is an experiment in Search Labs, opt-in and United States only. Canadian search results are unchanged today, and the same four things still decide local visibility.

What was announced

At its developer conference today Google showed a version of search that generates a written answer above the ordinary results, with links to sources alongside it.

It is called the Search Generative Experience and it is available through Search Labs, which is opt-in and has a waiting list.

Access at launch is the United States only, in English, so nobody here can turn it on.

Google has been consistent in describing it as an experiment rather than a change to search.

The other announcement matters more today

Since it is the one that affects anybody reading this.

Bard, which opened to two countries in March and which Canadians could not use, is now available in a large number of countries including this one, with no waiting list.

So the thing announced eight weeks ago as unavailable is available today, and the thing announced today is unavailable.

That is roughly the pace this has been moving at, and it is the most useful thing to take from the week.

Anything concluded now about what these tools can do will need revisiting within a quarter.

What it looks like

The fourth is worth holding onto. What was demonstrated adds something above the results rather than replacing them, so the ten links are still there, further down the page than they were.

What it means for a small business today

Which is the question, and the answer is nothing.

Your search results here are exactly as they were yesterday.

No change to your site is required, warranted, or possible, since there is nothing to optimise for that anybody outside a United States experiment can observe.

Anybody offering to prepare your site for it this month is selling against an announcement rather than against anything measurable.

That call will come, as it did in March, and the answer is the same.

What might matter eventually

Stated as speculation, because that is what it is.

If a written answer appears above results generally, some searches that produce a click today would produce an answer instead.

That would affect informational questions most and somebody looking for a local business to hire least, since a summary of who to call still has to name somebody.

Whether the sources named alongside receive meaningful traffic is the question nobody can answer yet, including Google.

And whether it ships at all in this form is genuinely open, since experiments in Labs do not all become products.

None of that is a plan you can make today.

A worked example

A business asked what they should change this week.

Their listing had eleven reviews and four photographs, their service pages carried no prices, and their busiest page was a general explanation a competitor could have written.

Every one of those is a known weakness with a known fix, and none of them is about anything announced today.

They spent the month on reviews and prices instead.

Whatever search looks like in two years, a business with sixty reviews and published prices is in a better position than one with eleven and none.

That is the only strategy available that does not depend on guessing what ships and when.

The things that keep being the answer

Since they have not changed and are unlikely to.

Reviews, which no system can generate on your behalf.

Prices and timescales, which almost no competitor publishes.

Photographs of your own work, which are yours alone.

And being genuinely near the customer, which is not a content question at all.

Every version of search that has been demonstrated still has to name actual businesses, and those four are what make you nameable.

Watch your own figures rather than the news

The practical instruction for the next year.

Note your arrivals from search by month now, split branded and unbranded, so you have a baseline.

If any of this reaches here and affects you, it will show as clicks falling while impressions and positions hold, which is a specific and recognisable pattern.

Checking that quarterly costs ten minutes and tells you more about your business than any coverage of an experiment in another country.

Until that pattern appears in your own data, nothing has happened to you.

Advertising was in the demonstration

A detail worth noting, since it says something about the shape of whatever ships.

Google showed advertising continuing to appear alongside the generated answer rather than being displaced by it.

That is a reasonable indication that the eventual arrangement will preserve the commercial parts of the results page, since those fund the whole thing.

Which is a modest argument against the more dramatic predictions about search disappearing, and worth holding against the coverage this month.

It also suggests that for businesses who advertise, the change may be less disruptive than for those relying entirely on ordinary results.

The counter-case

This may turn out to be significant.

Google handles the overwhelming majority of searches, and a change to how results are presented eventually reaches every small business with a website.

Businesses whose traffic is mostly informational have a real exposure if this ships broadly, and it is reasonable to plan for that.

And the pace of the last six months means a year is a long time in this, so a position taken today should be held loosely.

Being unable to act is not the same as being unable to prepare, and the preparing list has not changed all year.

Note your baseline figures, ignore anybody selling urgency, and spend the month on reviews and prices.

This month

  1. Note that it is not available here.
  2. Record your search arrivals as a baseline.
  3. Split branded and unbranded.
  4. Decline anything sold on urgency.
  5. Try Bard, which you now can.
  6. Ask for reviews.
  7. Put prices on your pages.

Step two is the one that will matter in a year, since without a baseline you will not be able to tell whether anything happened or whether it was a slow quarter.

The March version of this week is covered in Google answered with its own.


Frequently asked questions

What was announced?

A version of search generating a written answer above the ordinary results, called the Search Generative Experience, available through Search Labs as an opt-in experiment.

Can I use it in Canada?

No. Access at launch is the United States only, in English, through a waiting list. Your search results here are exactly as they were yesterday.

What else was announced?

Bard, which opened to two countries in March and which Canadians could not use, is now available in a large number of countries including this one, with no waiting list.

Does it replace the results?

No. What was demonstrated adds an answer above the results rather than replacing them, so the ordinary links are still there, further down the page.

What should I change this week?

Nothing about the announcement. There is nothing to optimise for that anybody outside a United States experiment can observe.

How will I know if it affects me?

Clicks falling while impressions and positions hold. Note your search arrivals now, split branded and unbranded, so you have a baseline to compare against.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Had a call about preparing for AI search?

Nothing has changed in results here. Note your search arrivals as a baseline and spend the month on reviews.

Start a Conversation