Galleries fail by being too large, too slow, and unlabelled. A curated set of the best work, grouped by service, with captions explaining what is being shown, outperforms a complete archive that visitors abandon after the first screen.

The archive problem

The instinct is to include everything, because each photograph represents real work and leaving one out feels like discarding it.

What that produces is a grid of ninety near-identical thumbnails. A visitor scans the first row, sees no reason to think the rest differs, and leaves.

Twelve carefully chosen photographs are looked at properly. Ninety are not looked at at all, which means the ninety-first job you added is doing less for you than a smaller set would.

Curate by variety, not by recency

The selection principle that matters.

A visitor is asking whether you have done work like theirs. That means the set should cover the range: different services, different property types, different scales, and different conditions.

Ten photographs of the same kind of job demonstrate less than six covering six situations. Duplicates of your best work are the most common thing to cut.

Where the work is genuinely repetitive, group it and show two or three examples rather than twenty.

Group it by what people are looking for

By service, and where relevant by property type, rather than as one undifferentiated set.

Someone with a flat roof does not want to scroll past pitched roofs. Filtering or clear sections turn a browse into a search, which is what the visitor was doing anyway.

Sections work better than filters on a small gallery, since filters add a control to learn and a section is just a heading. Filters earn their place past thirty or so images.

Captions do more than the photographs

The most under-used element, and the cheapest to add.

A photograph of a finished bathroom shows a bathroom. The same photograph captioned with what the problem was, what was done, how long it took, and roughly what it cost is a case study in one line.

Captions also carry information a photograph cannot: the area, the age of the property, and the constraint that made it difficult. That is what demonstrates judgement rather than only tidiness.

They are read by search engines too, which a photograph is not, so the gallery becomes findable rather than decorative.

Before and after

The strongest format in this category and it has requirements.

The two images need the same angle, similar lighting, and enough resemblance that the comparison is obvious. A before shot taken hurriedly on a phone against a carefully composed after shot reads as a trick rather than a demonstration.

Presenting them adjacent is more reliable than a slider, which requires interaction, does not always work well on a phone, and hides one of the two images from anyone who does not use it.

The technical part

The thumbnail point is worth emphasising. A gallery is the most common cause of a slow page on a trades site, and it is almost always because full-size images are being displayed small rather than resized properly.

The lightbox

Where clicking a thumbnail opens a larger view. Useful, and frequently implemented badly.

It needs an obvious close control, closing on the escape key, arrow keys and swipe for moving between images, and keyboard focus handled so it is not a trap for anyone not using a mouse.

It should also show the caption. A lightbox displaying only the image discards the information that made the gallery worth having.

On a phone

Where most of this is viewed, and where a desktop grid becomes a very long scroll.

Two columns rather than four, since one image per row wastes space and four are too small to assess. Swipe between images in the enlarged view, since that is the expected gesture. And a limit on how many load before a load more control, so the page does not become endless.

Where the gallery sits

Not only as a single page in the navigation.

A few relevant images on each service page do more than a comprehensive gallery elsewhere, because they appear beside the decision. The full gallery is then for the visitor who wants more, rather than the only place the work appears.

That placement logic is the same one that applies to proof generally, and the photographs themselves need the same care about what is visible in them as anywhere else, which is covered in what your photographs say that you did not intend.


Frequently asked questions

How many photographs should a gallery have?

Fewer than most businesses use. Twelve carefully chosen images get looked at properly; ninety near-identical thumbnails mean a visitor scans the first row and leaves.

How should I choose which to include?

By variety rather than recency. The visitor is asking whether you have done work like theirs, so cover different services, property types, scales, and conditions.

Do captions matter?

They are the most under-used element. A caption stating the problem, what was done, how long it took, and roughly the cost turns a photograph into a case study in one line.

What is the best way to show before and after?

Adjacent images at the same angle and similar lighting. Sliders require interaction, work poorly on phones, and hide one image from anyone who does not use the control.

Why is my gallery slow?

Almost always because full-resolution images are being displayed small rather than resized into thumbnails. That is the most common cause of a slow page on a trades site.

Where should the gallery go?

A few relevant images on each service page do more than a comprehensive gallery elsewhere, because they appear beside the decision. The full gallery is for people who want more.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Gallery with ninety photos and a five-second load?

We cut it to the work that demonstrates range, add the captions that make it findable, and fix the thumbnails.

Start a Conversation