Customers cannot assess technical quality, so they assess whether they understood what you told them. An explanation that names the consequence rather than the component is what converts a number into a decision.

Why the explanation is the product

In most technical trades the customer cannot evaluate the work. They cannot tell whether the wiring is correct, whether the substrate was prepared, or whether the diagnosis was right.

What they can evaluate is whether the person explaining it seemed to know what they were talking about, and whether the explanation made sense.

Which means the explanation is not a courtesy attached to the work. It is the part of the service the customer is actually able to judge, and it decides whether a higher quote is understood as thorough or as expensive.

Lead with the consequence

The single most useful change, and it inverts how most technical people naturally explain.

The instinct is to explain the mechanism and arrive at the implication. The customer needs the implication first, because that is what tells them whether to keep listening.

What that looks like: the reason your bathroom fan is not clearing the steam, followed by why. Not a description of duct runs arriving eventually at the point.

In writing, that means the first sentence of any technical section says what it means for the reader, and the detail follows for the people who want it.

Name the thing, then explain it once

The compromise between plain language and precision.

Avoiding technical terms entirely makes the explanation vague and makes you sound less expert. Using them without explanation excludes the reader.

Using the correct term with a short definition attached does both jobs: the customer learns the word, they can repeat it to somebody else, and you have demonstrated that you know it.

That also helps practically. A customer who can name what they need is a customer who describes the problem accurately next time.

Analogies, used carefully

Effective and worth a caution.

A good analogy makes an unfamiliar system understandable by mapping it onto a familiar one. A stretched one produces a wrong mental model that has to be corrected later.

The test is whether the analogy holds for the decision the customer is making. If it explains the general idea but implies the wrong conclusion about cost or urgency, it is doing harm.

Where an analogy fails, saying plainly that it is more complicated than a simple comparison is better than forcing one.

What customers actually want to know

The third is the one that determines urgency and is frequently missing. A customer who does not know whether something can wait a year assumes it can.

The fourth is what builds trust. Presenting a cheaper option, including the option of doing nothing yet, is what makes the recommendation credible.

Photographs instead of description

The technique that outperforms writing in most trades.

A photograph of what you found, sent to the customer with two sentences, does more than a paragraph. It also removes the suspicion that the work was unnecessary, which is the underlying doubt in every technical trade.

This works particularly for anything hidden: inside a wall, under a floor, behind a panel, or on a roof. The customer will never see it otherwise, and seeing it converts your assertion into their observation.

What to avoid

Explaining to justify the price rather than to inform. Customers detect the difference and it reads as defensive.

Excessive detail, which is a common failure among people who know the subject. Depth signals expertise to peers and signals padding to customers.

Certainty you do not have. Saying you will know more once it is opened up is honest, and it prepares them for the possibility that the price moves.

Criticising previous work beyond what is necessary. It is frequently deserved and it makes the customer wonder how you will describe them.

On the site rather than only in person

The commercial argument for writing this down.

The explanation you give on site reaches one customer. The same explanation on a page reaches everybody who searches the problem, and it arrives before they have chosen anybody.

It also does the qualifying work in advance, since a customer who has read why the job is what it is arrives at the quote already understanding the number.

That is the same argument for making invisible work visible that applies to any trade where the difference between quotes is hidden, as described in what a tile and stone website needs.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the explanation matter so much?

Because customers cannot evaluate the work. What they can evaluate is whether the explanation made sense, which decides whether a higher quote reads as thorough or expensive.

What is the most useful change?

Leading with the consequence rather than the mechanism. The customer needs to know what it means for them before they will keep listening to why.

Should I avoid technical terms?

No. Use the correct term with a short definition attached. That teaches the customer the word, lets them repeat it, and demonstrates that you know it.

What do customers most want to know?

What is wrong, what caused it, what happens if it is not fixed and how quickly, what the options are including doing less, what you recommend, and what it costs.

What works better than description?

A photograph of what you found with two sentences. It removes the suspicion that the work was unnecessary, which is the underlying doubt in every technical trade.

What should be avoided?

Explaining to justify the price rather than to inform, excessive detail that reads as padding, certainty you do not have, and criticising previous work beyond what is necessary.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Quotes that get questioned on price?

We write the explanations onto the site so customers arrive already understanding what the number covers.

Start a Conversation