Give three or four plain rules rather than a policy document: ask before photographing a customer's property, never show addresses or people, and send anything uncertain to one person first.

The material is genuinely good

Photographs taken by whoever is doing the work are better than anything produced deliberately.

They are taken at the right moment, they show the actual job, and they look real because they are.

Staff also reach audiences the business does not: their own friends locally, who are exactly the people a local business wants.

Which is why the instinct to discourage this is wrong, and why the goal is guidance rather than prevention.

What actually goes wrong

The sixth is the one that causes the most damage and is the least anticipated: a photograph showing somebody working without proper equipment is evidence, and it circulates.

Three rules, not a document

The form the guidance should take for a small business.

A policy document will not be read, and a business with four staff does not need one.

Ask the customer before photographing their property, every time.

Never show an address, a number plate, a face, or the inside of a home.

If you are unsure, send it to one named person before posting.

Those three cover almost everything, take a minute to explain, and are actually rememberable, which is the only property that matters.

Asking is easier than it sounds

Because the anticipated awkwardness is the reason it does not happen.

Most customers say yes, particularly when asked at the end of a job they are pleased with, and being asked is itself flattering.

The wording is simple: we sometimes put photographs of our work online, would you mind if we used a picture of this.

Make clear that nothing identifying will be shown, which resolves the objection most people have.

Note the answer somewhere, since a verbal yes six months ago is difficult to rely on when somebody objects later.

And accept a no without negotiating, which is what makes asking safe to do repeatedly.

A worked example

A business encouraged staff to photograph their work and share it, which produced a steady flow of good material.

One post showed a completed driveway with the house number clearly visible and the customer's car in the frame.

The customer saw it, was unhappy, and asked for it to be removed, which it was within the hour.

Nothing further came of it and the relationship was damaged.

Afterwards the owner spent five minutes with each member of staff explaining the three rules, and printed them on a card for the vans.

The flow of photographs continued at the same rate, and the problem did not recur.

Personal accounts are different

A distinction worth drawing explicitly, since it is where guidance gets uncomfortable.

What somebody posts from their own account, in their own time, is theirs.

What you can reasonably ask is that customer information is not published, which is about the customer rather than about the employee.

Frame it that way, because a business telling staff what they may post looks like control, and a business asking staff not to publish a customer's address is obviously reasonable.

Avoid rules about mentioning the employer at all, which are impossible to enforce and produce resentment for no benefit.

The customer-privacy line is the one that everybody accepts and it covers nearly all of the real risk.

Give them something to post

The half that turns guidance into a benefit.

Tell staff explicitly that job photographs are welcome and that good ones may be used by the business.

Ask for the before shot, since that is the thing that gets missed and it is only available on arrival.

Give them somewhere to send them: a shared album, a message group, or an address, rather than expecting them to be found later on phones.

And credit the person when you use one, which costs nothing and makes the next one more likely.

Businesses that do this get more material than any deliberate effort would produce.

Say what happens if something goes wrong

Briefly, because it removes the fear that stops people posting anything.

Make clear that a mistake means taking it down, not a disciplinary process, provided it was an honest one.

That distinction matters: staff who fear consequences post nothing, which loses the benefit entirely.

Say who to tell and that telling quickly is what matters, since a post removed within an hour is rarely a problem and one left up for a week can be.

Reserve anything more serious for what deserves it: abuse, disclosure of something confidential, or unsafe practice.

What happens when somebody leaves

The loose end that only becomes visible afterwards.

Photographs of your work sit on a former employee's account, and posts they made remain associated with the business.

Mostly that is harmless and occasionally it matters, particularly where somebody leaves on poor terms or goes to a competitor.

You cannot require removal of somebody's own posts, and you can make sure the business holds its own copy of anything worth keeping, which is the practical protection.

Add collecting photographs to whatever you already do when somebody leaves, alongside keys and access, since the material is genuinely valuable and is otherwise lost.

The counter-case

Some businesses genuinely need a document.

Anybody working in homes with vulnerable people, in healthcare, in schools, or under a client contract with confidentiality terms has obligations that three rules do not cover.

A business with more than a handful of staff also reaches a point where verbal guidance is inconsistently transmitted and something written is necessary.

And there are contracts, particularly commercial and public sector ones, that prohibit publishing anything about the work at all, which staff cannot be expected to know unless told.

Check your own obligations first, and where they are ordinary, keep it to three rules.

The five minutes

  1. Tell staff photographs are welcome.
  2. Ask the customer, every time.
  3. Never show addresses, plates, faces, or interiors.
  4. Send anything uncertain to one named person.
  5. Give them somewhere to send photographs.
  6. Say a mistake means taking it down.
  7. Check any contract that restricts this.

Step three is the whole of the risk in a sentence, and it is short enough to print on a card for a van, which is where guidance actually gets read.

Keeping a rhythm going is covered in posting three times and stopping.


Frequently asked questions

Should I discourage staff from posting about work?

No. Photographs taken by whoever is doing the work are better than anything produced deliberately, and staff reach local audiences the business does not.

What actually goes wrong?

A visible house number or street sign, a vehicle registration, the inside of a home, an identifiable customer, a complaint, or something unsafe being done on camera.

Do I need a policy document?

For a small business, no. Three rules that people remember beat a document nobody reads: ask the customer, show nothing identifying, and check anything uncertain with one person.

How do I ask a customer?

At the end of a job they are pleased with, saying you sometimes put work online and asking whether they would mind. Make clear nothing identifying will be shown, and note the answer.

What about personal accounts?

What somebody posts in their own time is theirs. Ask only that customer information is not published, which is about the customer rather than about the employee.

What if somebody gets it wrong?

Say plainly that an honest mistake means taking it down rather than a disciplinary process. Staff who fear consequences post nothing, which loses the benefit entirely.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Staff taking good job photos?

Give them three rules and somewhere to send them. Ask for the before shot, since that is the one nobody remembers.

Start a Conversation