Answer the questions people fix themselves, because those readers recommend you to the ones who cannot. Judge it over years rather than by direct enquiries.

The objection

A trade writing about how to do something is teaching people not to hire them, which is a reasonable thing to be wary of.

The person reading how to clear a blockage themselves is not going to pay you to clear it.

And the effort spent writing it could have gone into a page aimed at somebody ready to buy.

All of that is true and it misses what the page is actually doing, which is not converting that reader.

What it is actually doing

The second is the mechanism people underestimate. A meaningful share of readers try the simple fix, fail, and hire the business whose instructions they were following, because that business has already demonstrated it knows.

The referral is the return

And it arrives on a delay long enough that nobody attributes it correctly.

Somebody who solved a problem using your page tells a friend about it when that friend has the same problem.

The friend does not want to do it themselves, so they ask who to call, and the answer is you.

That enquiry arrives as a referral with no visible connection to anything you published, which is why this kind of content is consistently undervalued.

Ask new customers how they heard of you and listen for the second-hand version, since somebody read something of ours comes up more often than businesses expect.

Answer honestly, including when not to call you

The version that works, as opposed to the version that hedges.

Say plainly when a problem is straightforward enough to handle yourself, and how to do it.

Then say what would mean stopping and calling somebody: what you might find, what makes it unsafe, and what makes it more expensive if it goes wrong.

That is honest, useful, and does the commercial work at the same time, since the reader now has a clear criterion for when to call rather than a vague sense that they should.

A page that hedges everything, so the reader cannot tell whether to attempt it, helps nobody and reads as an attempt to generate a call.

A worked example

A trade published a page explaining how to diagnose a common fault, including the three checks anybody can do and what each result means.

It said clearly that two of the outcomes were straightforward and gave instructions, and that the third meant stopping.

It became the most-read page on the site, with more traffic than every service page combined, and produced very few direct enquiries.

Over the following two years, several customers mentioned it unprompted, including two who had been sent the link by somebody else.

It also attracted links from a local forum and a community group, which lifted the whole site.

Judged on direct enquiries in the first month it was a failure, and judged over two years it was the best page they had.

Choose which questions to answer

Since this is not an argument for answering everything.

Answer the ones where the reader could plausibly succeed and where failing is not dangerous or expensive.

Answer the ones you are asked constantly, since the volume of asking is evidence of the volume of searching.

Do not answer the ones where an amateur attempt causes real harm, which is a genuine reason to withhold instructions and to say why.

And do not answer the ones where the whole job is the knowledge, since publishing a complete method for your core service is a different decision from helping with a common small problem.

The line is roughly between what you would happily explain on the phone and what you would not.

Measuring it fairly

Because measured the usual way it always looks like a failure.

Do not judge it by enquiries from that page, which will be few by design.

Judge it by whether people mention it, by links it attracts, and by whether the site as a whole is stronger.

Give it two years, which is longer than anybody wants and is how long referral chains take.

And note it as an experiment with a review date rather than an ongoing commitment, so there is a point at which you decide honestly.

One or two such pages is the right number for most small businesses, not a strategy built around them.

The reciprocal version

Worth mentioning, since it produces the same effect faster.

Recommending other trades, by name, for the work you do not do is content for people who will never buy from you in a direct sense.

It is also the single most reliable way to be recommended in return, and the businesses you name will notice.

A short page saying who you send people to for adjacent work costs nothing and puts you into several other businesses' referral conversations.

That is the same mechanism as the instructional page, operating between businesses rather than between neighbours.

The counter-case

This can be overdone badly.

A business whose site is nothing but free advice and never says what it sells has an audience and no customers, which is a real failure mode.

The commercial pages have to exist and be good first, since this kind of content supports them rather than replacing them.

There are also trades where publishing instructions is genuinely irresponsible, and safety outranks the marketing argument every time.

Write one or two, choose questions where the reader could safely succeed, say clearly when to stop, and judge it over years.

What to do

  1. Pick a question you answer constantly.
  2. Check the reader could safely succeed.
  3. Give the actual instructions.
  4. Say clearly when to stop and why.
  5. Do not judge it on direct enquiries.
  6. Ask customers whether they read anything.
  7. Name the trades you refer work to.

Step four is what makes the page work commercially without compromising it, since a reader with a clear criterion for when to call is more likely to call than one left uncertain throughout.

The failure mode at the other extreme is covered in a page that ranks and helps nobody.

Frequently asked questions

Why help people who will not buy?

Because they recommend you to the ones who cannot do it themselves, because some try the simple fix and fail, and because it demonstrates competence to everybody else reading.

How does the return arrive?

As a referral with no visible connection to anything you published, on a delay of a year or more, which is why this content is consistently undervalued.

Should I hedge the instructions?

No. Say plainly when a problem is straightforward and how to handle it, then say what would mean stopping and calling. A hedged page helps nobody and reads as a sales attempt.

Which questions should I answer?

Ones where the reader could plausibly succeed and failing is not dangerous or expensive, and ones you are asked constantly. Roughly what you would happily explain on the phone.

How should I measure it?

Not by enquiries from that page. By whether people mention it, links it attracts, and whether the site is stronger. Give it two years, which is how long referral chains take.

Can this be overdone?

Yes. A site that is nothing but free advice and never says what it sells has an audience and no customers. One or two such pages is right for most small businesses.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Reluctant to explain the easy fix?

Explain it, and say clearly what would mean stopping and calling. The second half is what makes the first half work.

Start a Conversation