Comparison tables work when they help somebody choose between genuine alternatives, including alternatives that are not yours. Tables built to make one option look obvious are recognised, and competitor comparisons carry legal requirements.

The two kinds and their different rules

Comparing your own options. Service tiers, materials, packages. Low risk, genuinely useful, and the version most small businesses should build.

Comparing yourself to competitors. Higher value when done well and subject to advertising law, since every cell is a representation about somebody else's business.

The second requires that claims be accurate, current, and supportable, and comparing against a competitor's superseded price or specification is a misleading representation even if it was true once.

Which makes competitor tables a maintenance obligation as well as a research task, and most small businesses should not build one.

The table that helps somebody choose

What a customer actually wants from a comparison.

The last point is what makes a table credible. An option with no disadvantage listed reads as the one being sold, and a reader discounts the whole table accordingly.

The manipulations readers recognise

Worth naming because they are common enough to be transparent.

The decoy option. A tier priced to make the one beside it look reasonable, which nobody is expected to choose.

Invented differentiators. Rows added so the higher tier has more ticks, describing things that are not meaningfully different.

Asymmetric detail. The preferred option described generously and the others in a word.

Missing rows. Omitting a dimension where the cheaper option wins.

Highlighting one column as most popular without that being true, which is a factual claim about other customers' behaviour.

That last one is worth care. Labelling something as most popular or recommended is a representation, and if it is not accurate it is a misleading one.

Including the option that is not you

The technique that builds the most credibility and is used least.

Adding a column for doing it yourself, doing nothing, or a category of alternative you do not offer, described fairly.

For a trades business that might be the difference between repair and replacement, or between hiring somebody and handling it themselves.

Describing honestly when the other option is right does two things. It is genuinely useful to the reader, and it makes every other row believable, because the table is evidently not built to reach one conclusion.

Businesses fear this loses work. In practice the customer for whom the other option is right was never going to buy, and the customer reading an honest table trusts the recommendation when it points at you.

Making it work on a phone

The practical failure, since most tables are designed on a desktop.

A four-column table becomes unreadable on a phone, and horizontal scrolling within a table is awkward and frequently unnoticed.

What works: stacking into cards on narrow screens, so each option becomes a block with its features listed. Or limiting to two or three columns, which is usually enough anyway.

Tables also need proper markup with header cells so a screen reader can associate values with their headings, since a table built out of styled divisions is unnavigable without sight.

How many options

Three is the usual answer and two is frequently better.

More options make the decision harder rather than easier, and a customer who cannot decide postpones rather than choosing.

Where you have many variants, the workable approach is a small number of tiers with a note that arrangements can be tailored, rather than a table of eight columns that nobody reads.

The maintenance obligation

Worth stating because it is where tables go wrong over time.

A table with prices needs updating when prices change, and a table with features needs updating when what is included changes.

A stale table is a representation that has become inaccurate, which is a worse position than not having published one.

Where the table includes competitors, that obligation extends to their changes as well, which is the practical reason to avoid them.

The test

Show the table to somebody and ask which option they would choose and why.

If they cannot articulate a reason, the differences are not meaningful. If they all choose the same one and cannot say why, it is doing persuasion rather than comparison.

A good table produces different answers from different people, because it lets each of them find the option that suits their situation, which is the same honesty applied to how prices are presented, as covered in writing about price without committing.

Frequently asked questions

What are the two kinds of comparison table?

Comparing your own options, which is low risk and useful, and comparing yourself to competitors, which is subject to advertising law since every cell is a representation.

What makes a table credible?

Stating the trade-off each option involves. An option with no disadvantage listed reads as the one being sold, and the reader discounts the whole table.

Which manipulations do readers recognise?

Decoy tiers, invented differentiators, asymmetric detail, omitting rows where the cheaper option wins, and labelling a column most popular when it is not.

Should I include an option that is not mine?

It builds the most credibility. Describing honestly when doing nothing or doing it themselves is right makes every other row believable.

How do I make a table work on a phone?

Stack it into cards on narrow screens, or limit it to two or three columns. Use proper table markup with header cells so screen readers can navigate it.

How many options should I show?

Three at most, and two is frequently better. More options make the decision harder, and a customer who cannot decide postpones rather than choosing.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Comparison table where the middle column has all the ticks?

We rebuild it around the differences customers actually decide on, including the honest disadvantages of each.

Start a Conversation