Answer within the deadline with documents: proof of delivery, what the customer agreed to, and the communications. Argument without evidence loses.

What is actually happening

A customer has asked their card issuer to reverse a payment, and the issuer has taken the money back from you pending a decision.

You are not in a conversation with the customer, you are submitting evidence to somebody who will decide from documents.

That distinction determines everything about how to respond, because a fair account of what happened counts for nothing without the records to support it.

There is also a deadline, usually short, and missing it decides the case regardless of the merits.

The three common kinds

Worth telling apart, since the right response differs.

Genuine fraud, where somebody else used the card, and you will usually lose unless the goods were verifiably delivered to the cardholder.

A service or delivery complaint, where the customer says the goods never arrived or were not as described, which is winnable with records.

And what the industry calls friendly fraud, where the customer did receive the goods and disputes anyway, sometimes because they did not recognise the name on their statement.

The third is the most common for small shops and the most preventable, which is worth knowing before spending effort on the other two.

What actually counts as evidence

The first is decisive in most delivery disputes and is why tracked shipping is worth its cost on anything above a modest value. Untracked delivery is effectively undefendable.

Respond within the deadline

The most common reason small businesses lose, and it is entirely avoidable.

The window is typically measured in days rather than weeks, and it starts when the notice is issued rather than when you read it.

Notices arrive by email from the payment provider and are easy to miss among order notifications, particularly in December.

Set the notification to reach somebody who checks, and diarise the deadline the moment one arrives.

A partial response inside the deadline beats a thorough one after it, since a missed deadline is decided automatically.

Present it as documents

Since the format matters as much as the content.

Lead with the single strongest piece: the delivery confirmation showing the address and the date.

Then the order record, the checkout terms, and the message history, each labelled plainly.

Write a short covering summary of a few sentences stating what was sold, when it was delivered, and what the customer said, in that order.

Do not write an emotional account of how unfair the dispute is, which is common and carries no weight with somebody reading fifty of these.

Facts, dated, with the documents attached, is the whole submission.

A worked example

A shop received a chargeback for an order dispatched three months earlier, claiming the goods never arrived.

The notice sat unread for eight days during a busy period.

When they responded, they had two days left and could not locate the tracking record, since it had been kept only in the courier's system, which retained ninety days.

They lost the case and the goods.

Afterwards they set chargeback notices to go to two addresses, and began exporting tracking numbers with each order into their own records.

Two later disputes were answered inside forty-eight hours with full records and both were resolved in their favour.

Prevent the friendly kind

Which is where the most improvement is available.

Make sure the name appearing on the customer's statement is one they will recognise, since a trading name different from the legal name causes a substantial share of disputes.

Send a clear confirmation and dispatch notice with your name in it, so the transaction is memorable.

Make it easy to contact you, because a customer who cannot reach you contacts their bank instead, and that is the whole mechanism.

And answer messages promptly, since most friendly chargebacks are preceded by an unanswered enquiry.

Those four changes cost nothing and remove the largest category.

Sometimes refunding is the right answer

Worth stating, since fighting everything is not the correct strategy.

Where the customer has a point, refund before it becomes a chargeback, since a refund costs the sale and a chargeback costs the sale plus a fee plus a mark against your ratio.

Where the amount is small and the evidence is weak, the time spent responding may exceed the value.

And where a customer contacts you first, resolving it directly is always cheaper than letting it reach the issuer.

Reply quickly to any complaint about a charge, since that reply is what prevents the case existing.

Keep the evidence where you can reach it

The preparation that decides cases months later.

Tracking records, delivery confirmations, and message histories frequently live in a courier's system or a chat tool with its own retention period, which may be shorter than the dispute window.

A chargeback can arrive several months after an order, by which point the record you needed has been purged by somebody else's policy.

Export the tracking number and delivery confirmation into your own order record at the point of dispatch, which takes seconds per order if it is part of the process.

Ask each supplier how long they keep records, since the answer determines whether your evidence will exist when you need it.

The counter-case

You will lose some regardless.

The process favours the cardholder by design, and a well-evidenced case can still go against you, which is worth expecting rather than resenting.

Chasing every small dispute also costs time that is worth more elsewhere, particularly during a busy period.

And an unusually high number of disputes is a signal about your product descriptions or delivery times rather than about dishonest customers.

Answer inside the deadline, lead with proof of delivery, fix your statement name, and refund early where the customer has a point.

What to do

  1. Route notices to somebody who checks.
  2. Diarise the deadline immediately.
  3. Lead with proof of delivery.
  4. Attach order, terms, and messages.
  5. Write facts, not an argument.
  6. Keep tracking records in your own system.
  7. Check your statement name is recognisable.

Step seven prevents more cases than any improvement to how you answer them, since a customer who does not recognise the name on their statement disputes a charge they actually made.

What records you should be keeping at all is covered in handling card details you should not have.


Frequently asked questions

What is a chargeback?

A customer has asked their card issuer to reverse a payment. You are not in a conversation with the customer, you are submitting evidence to somebody deciding from documents.

What are the common kinds?

Genuine fraud, a delivery or description complaint, and friendly fraud where the customer received the goods and disputes anyway. The third is the most common and most preventable.

What counts as evidence?

Proof of delivery with tracking, a signature, the order record, what the customer agreed to at checkout, the message history, and your policies as they appeared.

Why do small businesses lose?

Missing the deadline, which is measured in days and starts when the notice is issued. A partial response inside the window beats a thorough one after it.

How should I present it?

Lead with the delivery confirmation, then the order record, terms, and messages, each labelled. A few factual sentences, not an account of how unfair the dispute is.

How do I prevent friendly fraud?

Make sure the statement name is recognisable, send clear confirmations, make it easy to contact you, and answer messages promptly. Most are preceded by an unanswered enquiry.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Do you know what name appears on your customers' statements?

Check it. An unrecognised trading name causes a large share of disputes.

Start a Conversation