The mechanics are learnable in a few weeks. The real cost is somebody's sustained weekly attention, which is what most small businesses cannot supply and what an agency is actually selling.

The question behind the question

Usually it is whether the fee is worth it, prompted by a report that showed activity rather than results.

The honest answer depends less on whether you can learn the tools, which you can, and more on whether somebody in the business will look at the account every week for the next two years.

That second thing is what actually fails, and it fails quietly.

An account moved in-house and then left alone for four months performs worse than the same account managed indifferently by a supplier.

What you are actually paying for

The sixth is the part people assume they are buying and the part most easily replaced. The first is the part that is hard to replace and rarely considered.

What is genuinely learnable

More than most business owners expect.

Setting up a campaign with the right objective, defining an audience, writing adverts, building a landing page, and reading the reporting are all learnable in a few weeks of deliberate effort.

The platforms publish reasonable training, the interfaces are designed for self-service, and a small account is not technically complicated.

Somebody in the business who is comfortable with a spreadsheet and willing to read can reach competence on a modest account within a month or two.

The knowledge barrier is real and it is lower than the industry suggests.

What is harder to replace

Three things, and they are not technical.

Judgement built from seeing many accounts, which tells somebody quickly whether a result is normal or unusual for that market.

Knowing what changed on a platform last month, which explains half of unexpected performance shifts and is difficult to keep up with while running a business.

And the discipline of consistent review, which an external supplier does because they are paid to and an internal person does until something urgent happens.

The third is the one that determines the outcome, and it is a scheduling problem rather than a skills problem.

The arithmetic

Worth doing honestly before deciding.

Take the monthly fee. Then estimate the hours in-house management would actually take: setup, then perhaps two to four hours a month sustained, plus the learning period.

Value those hours at what that person's time is worth, including what they will not be doing instead.

For a small account, the fee and the internal cost are frequently closer than expected, and the saving is smaller than the invoice suggests.

Where the fee is a large proportion of the spend, which is common at small budgets, the arithmetic favours in-house more clearly, and that is the situation where it usually makes sense.

A worked example

A business paying a monthly fee on a modest ad budget decided to bring it in-house, largely because the fee exceeded a third of the spend.

The owner's daughter, who worked in the business, spent about three weeks learning the interface and rebuilt the campaigns.

Performance was roughly the same after two months, at a lower total cost, which was the intended result.

Nine months later it had drifted: the same adverts were still running, the budget had not been adjusted, and cost per enquiry had climbed steadily without anybody noticing.

They fixed it by putting a recurring half hour in the calendar every Monday, which restored performance within about six weeks.

Their conclusion was that the learning had taken three weeks and the discipline had taken nine months to establish.

The hybrid worth considering

Frequently better than either extreme and rarely offered.

Run the account yourself and pay somebody competent for a few hours quarterly to review it, tell you what is wrong, and flag what has changed on the platform.

That buys the judgement and the awareness without the ongoing fee, and it suits a small account well.

Many freelancers and small agencies will do this, though few advertise it, because a retainer is a better business for them.

Ask for it specifically as a review arrangement rather than management, and expect to pay properly for the hours rather than expecting a favour.

How to learn it without wasting money

A sequence that limits the cost of the learning period.

Start while the agency is still running things, with a small separate campaign of your own, so mistakes are contained.

Learn on one platform rather than three, since the concepts transfer and the interfaces do not.

Do the platform's own training, which is free and better than most paid courses.

Take a full export of the existing account before any transition, so you have the history when the access ends.

And overlap the handover by a month rather than switching on a date, which is worth negotiating and most suppliers will accept.

The counter-case

Several situations argue clearly against bringing it in.

A complex account across several platforms, with feeds, shopping, or substantial spend, is genuinely specialist work and the failure modes are expensive.

A business with nobody who wants to do it should not assign it to somebody reluctant, because it will be neglected and the neglect will be invisible for months.

And a business whose constraint is elsewhere, in the offer, the response time, or the landing page, will not improve results by changing who presses the buttons.

There is also a version of this driven by dissatisfaction with a particular supplier, where the answer is a different supplier rather than a different model.

Bring it in when the fee is disproportionate to the spend and somebody genuinely wants the job. Otherwise fix the brief.

Deciding

  1. Compare the fee against the spend as a proportion.
  2. Name the person who will do it, and ask if they want to.
  3. Cost their hours honestly, including the learning.
  4. Learn on one platform while the agency still runs things.
  5. Export the account history before the transition.
  6. Book a recurring weekly slot in the calendar.
  7. Buy a quarterly review from somebody experienced.

Step six is what determines whether this works, and step two is what determines whether step six survives past month three.

Choosing between supplier types is covered in hiring a freelancer instead of an agency.

Frequently asked questions

Can I learn to run my own campaigns?

Yes. Setting objectives, defining audiences, writing adverts, and reading reporting are learnable in a few weeks. The knowledge barrier is lower than the industry suggests.

What am I actually paying an agency for?

Mostly attention, plus pattern recognition from other accounts and awareness of platform changes. The mechanics are the smallest part of it.

What usually goes wrong in-house?

Drift. The account is set up well and then left alone, so the same adverts run for months and cost per enquiry climbs without anybody noticing.

Does it actually save money?

Less than the invoice suggests, once you value the internal hours. It favours in-house most clearly where the fee is a large proportion of the spend, which is common at small budgets.

Is there a middle option?

Yes. Run it yourself and pay somebody competent for a few hours quarterly to review it and flag platform changes. Few advertise this because a retainer is a better business for them.

When should I not bring it in?

Complex multi-platform accounts, when nobody actually wants the job, or when the real constraint is the offer, the response time, or the landing page.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Thinking about taking it in-house?

Name the person first and ask whether they want it. A recurring weekly half hour is what makes it work.

Start a Conversation