Use the platforms, and keep the things you own: your domain, your site, and a direct route to your customers. The risk is not that a platform disappears but that its terms change while you depend on it.

The bargain platforms offer

Somebody else brings the audience, handles the payments, provides the tools, and takes a cut or shows advertising.

For a small business that is a genuinely good deal, particularly at the start, because building an audience from nothing is slow and building a shop is expensive.

This is not an argument against using them. Refusing to be where your customers are is a poor strategy dressed as independence.

It is an argument about what you keep alongside it, and about noticing when a convenience has become a dependency.

The risk is change, not collapse

The distinction that matters, because the usual framing is wrong.

Platforms rarely vanish. What they do is change: fees rise, reach falls, rules tighten, categories are reorganised, and something that produced a third of your work stops producing it over a quarter.

None of that requires anybody to act against you. A change made for entirely ordinary reasons can remove a channel you built a business around.

And you have no notice, no appeal in any meaningful sense, and no relationship with whoever made the decision.

That is the actual exposure, and it is far more common than a platform closing.

The second risk is suspension

Rarer and more abrupt, and worth planning for separately.

An account can be suspended for a rule breach you did not know about, a report from a competitor, an automated classification, or a payment dispute.

The process is usually automated, the explanation is usually thin, and the appeal is usually a form.

A business whose entire customer contact runs through that account has just lost the ability to tell anybody what happened, which is the part that turns an inconvenience into a serious problem.

The question worth asking is not whether this is likely. It is what you would do on the morning it happened.

What you should own

The fourth is the one that matters most, because it is the only thing that lets you reach people without an intermediary's permission.

The dependency test

A short exercise worth doing once a year.

For each platform you use, ask what proportion of your enquiries or revenue comes through it, and what would happen if that fell by half next month.

Then ask whether you could contact your customers without it.

If a single platform produces most of your work and you have no independent route to those customers, that is the finding, and it does not require action tomorrow but it should not be news to you in a year.

Businesses that get hurt by this are almost never surprised by the change. They are surprised by how completely they had no alternative.

A worked example

A maker built a business on a marketplace over four years, reaching a substantial volume of orders.

Fees rose twice, and a change to how listings were ranked reduced her visibility over about two months for reasons never explained.

Orders fell by more than half.

What saved the business was something she had done unremarkably two years earlier: including a small printed card with every order inviting people to sign up for new releases, which had accumulated a few thousand addresses.

She sent one message explaining she was selling directly, and a meaningful proportion followed.

The marketplace remained a channel and stopped being the business.

Her assessment was that the card had cost almost nothing and had been the only thing standing between a difficult quarter and closing.

Use the platform to build the thing you own

The practical strategy, and it is better than either dependence or abstention.

Treat platform reach as a way to acquire customers you then have a direct relationship with, rather than as the relationship itself.

That means every order, enquiry, or interaction is an opportunity to obtain a direct route: an email address, a follow on something you control, or simply your details in their records.

Most platforms permit this within limits, and the limits are worth knowing, since some prohibit diverting customers off-platform and enforce it.

Work inside the rules and be consistent, because this accumulates slowly and only matters in aggregate.

What is worth building yourself

A judgement about where to spend, and it is not everything.

Build the thing that is expensive to lose: your domain, a site that explains what you do, and a list you control.

Do not build the things platforms genuinely do better, such as payment processing, marketplace discovery, or delivery logistics, where reproducing their capability is not a sensible use of a small business's money.

The aim is not independence from platforms. It is that no single one can end your ability to reach your customers.

A modest site and a list of a few thousand addresses achieves that, and neither is expensive.

The counter-case

This argument is frequently overstated, usually by people selling websites.

For a new business, platform reach is worth far more than independence, and spending early money building your own everything while nobody knows you exist is a common and expensive mistake.

Some businesses also genuinely belong on a platform: where discovery is the whole value, where customers will only transact there, or where the logistics are what you were buying.

And the cost of the alternative is real, since a site, a list, and the discipline to maintain both take time a small business may not have.

The proportionate position is to use platforms fully, keep the domain and the direct route from day one because those are cheap, and build more of your own only as the dependency grows.

What to do

  1. Register your own domain and keep it in your name.
  2. Use email on that domain, not the platform's.
  3. Ask every customer for a direct route, within the rules.
  4. Export your contacts regularly and hold them yourself.
  5. Keep original photographs and content.
  6. Run the dependency test annually.
  7. Know what you would do if the account went tomorrow.

Step seven takes ten minutes to think through and is the difference between a bad quarter and a closed business.

Ownership at the end of a project is covered in owning the files at the end.


Frequently asked questions

What is the actual platform risk?

Change rather than collapse. Fees rise, reach falls, rules tighten, and something producing a third of your work stops, without anybody acting against you and without notice.

What about suspension?

Rarer and more abrupt. The process is usually automated and the appeal is a form. A business whose entire customer contact runs through that account has lost the ability to explain what happened.

What should I own regardless?

Your domain, a site you control, email on your own domain, an exported contact list, original photographs, and a record of your reviews since those rarely transfer.

What is the dependency test?

For each platform, what proportion of your work comes through it, what happens if that halves next month, and whether you could contact those customers without it.

Should I avoid platforms?

No. Refusing to be where your customers are is a poor strategy dressed as independence, and platform reach is worth more than independence for a new business.

What should I not build myself?

Payment processing, marketplace discovery, and delivery logistics. Reproducing what platforms genuinely do better is not a sensible use of a small business's money.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Most of your work from one platform?

Work out what you would do the morning the account went. If the answer is nothing, start collecting direct contacts this week.

Start a Conversation