Before and After Without Exaggerating

Why the pair works

A finished photograph shows what you produced. A pair shows what you changed, which is what the customer is actually buying.

It also gives context. A good result on something already decent is less impressive than the same result from a poor starting point, and only the pair conveys that.

And it lets somebody recognise their own situation in the before, which is the moment they decide to enquire.

The technical requirement

Same position, same height, same lens, same light. Otherwise the comparison is between two photographs rather than two states.

That is harder than it sounds because the before is taken in a hurry at the start of a job and the after is taken carefully at the end.

The practical method: take the before deliberately, note where you stood, and photograph a reference point you can find again. A doorway, a corner, a fixed feature.

Some phones will show a faint overlay of a previous image to help line the second one up, which makes this considerably easier.

Where credibility is lost

• Different light, where the before is dim and the after is bright.
• Different angles, which makes the comparison impossible to read.
• Tidying only the after, so half the improvement is clearing up.
• Cropping differently, which hides what did not change.
• Editing one and not the other.
• Choosing the worst corner as the before and the best as the after.

The third is the most common and the most damaging, because a viewer notices and cannot tell how much of the transformation was your work.

A worked example

A driveway contractor whose before photographs were taken on wet grey mornings and afters on sunny afternoons.

The work was genuinely good. The pairs looked exaggerated, and two customers said so during quotes, which is the sort of comment most people think and do not make.

He changed to photographing both in similar conditions, waiting for the after rather than shooting it the moment he finished.

The pairs became less dramatic and more believable, and he stopped getting the comment.

His conversion improved, which he had not expected because the images looked less impressive.

The explanation is straightforward enough: a believable modest improvement persuades better than a dramatic one somebody quietly suspects.

Keeping the before at the time

The practical difficulty, which is that nobody wants to photograph anything at the start of a job.

You are unloading, the customer is talking, and the interesting photograph is three days away. Taking a careful before feels like a distraction.

Which is why most businesses have hundreds of afters and almost no befores, and cannot make pairs from any of it.

The habit worth building is two minutes before touching anything: stand where you will stand at the end, take four shots, and note the position.

It is the cheapest thing in this whole subject and the one most consistently skipped, because at the time it feels like it can wait and by the end it cannot be recovered.

What to include in the frame

Enough to show the scale of the job.

A tightly cropped before and after shows a change without showing what was involved. A wider frame shows the whole area, which is what somebody is comparing against their own.

Include the edges where new work meets old, which is where quality is visible and where a poor job would show.

And include anything that did not change, because that is what makes the comparison credible. A pair where everything is different reads as two different places.

The counter-case

Where before and after is the wrong format.

Work where the before is somebody's home in a state they would not want published, which is a permission question and frequently a no.

Jobs where the improvement is invisible: wiring, insulation, drainage. There the useful photographs are during the work rather than a pair.

New build and installation, where there is no meaningful before.

And anything where the before was another trade's work, which is a comparison it is usually wiser not to invite.

Permission, specifically

More sensitive for befores than afters.

A finished room is flattering. The same room in a poor state is not, and some customers will be happy with one and not the other.

Ask about both separately, and say the before will be published alongside. Somebody agreeing to photographs of the finished work has not agreed to a picture of their old kitchen appearing online.

Avoid anything identifying: house numbers, distinctive views from windows, personal belongings, vehicles.

And where somebody declines, respect it without pushing. There will be another job.

Editing, and the line

A modest amount is normal and expected.

Straightening, cropping consistently, and mild brightness correction applied equally to both are fine.

What crosses the line: adjusting one image and not the other, removing objects, changing colours, or anything that makes the result look different from what the customer will see.

The test is whether somebody standing in the finished space would recognise the photograph. If the room looks better in the picture than in reality, the editing has gone too far and the first visit will be a disappointment.

The during shot

The third image most people never take, and frequently the most persuasive of the three.

A photograph mid-job shows what was involved: what came out, what was underneath, how much work the finished surface is concealing.

That is where the price is justified. A customer looking at a before and after sees a change; one who also sees the middle understands why it cost what it did.

It is also the shot that demonstrates competence to anybody who knows the trade, including the next customer who happens to.

Take one when the job is at its worst, which is usually the moment you least feel like photographing anything.

Presenting them

1. Side by side rather than one above the other, where the layout allows.
2. Labelled clearly, since it is not always obvious which is which.
3. With a sentence saying what was done and roughly how long it took.
4. At the same size, so neither dominates.
5. With the cost band, if you publish prices, since that is what people want next.

The third is what turns a picture into a case study. The images show what changed; one sentence explains what it involved, and that is what somebody uses to judge whether it applies to them.

How to take both halves well is covered in taking a usable photo on a phone.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.