Answering a Review Written in Anger

The review posted at midnight

A one-star review appears on your listing just before midnight on a Saturday. It is written in a rush: capitals, everything that went wrong, the word never twice, and a warning to stay away.

Some of it is fair. Some is exaggerated. One sentence is simply wrong.

You read it the next morning, and a reply forms at once. It is every bit as angry as the review.

That reply should not be posted. Not because the review is right, but because a reply written in that mood helps nobody, least of all your business.

What an angry review is made of

Read it again once the first reaction has passed, and it usually comes apart into pieces.

• One real grievance, a specific thing that genuinely went wrong.
• Exaggeration wrapped around it: never, always, worst, everyone.
• A fact or two misremembered in the heat of the evening.
• Blame for one person, usually a member of staff described rather than named.
• A verdict for strangers: avoid this place.
• Sometimes a demand, for a refund or an apology, stated or implied.

The first is the one the reply has to find. Underneath most furious reviews is a single real failure, and a reply that deals with it has answered the review, whatever else was said around it.

Two people are angry

The reviewer wrote in anger, and you will read it in anger. Both are understandable: the business is yours, and something said about it is untrue.

A reply written in that state reads as a counter-attack. It answers every sentence, quotes a policy, and invites the reviewer to escalate with a longer edit or a second review somewhere else.

So wait. A night's sleep is usually enough, and a reply within a day or two still reads as prompt. A reply within the hour rarely reads as calm.

Who the reply is really for

The reviewer may never be persuaded. The reply is written for the person deciding next week whether to book a table, hire you or walk through the door.

That reader cannot tell who was right. They are judging one thing: how you behave when a customer is unhappy in public.

A calm, short reply under a furious review is about the strongest evidence a listing can show. An angry reply under a fair review is the weakest.

Find out what happened first

Before writing a word, check whatever can be checked: the booking, the bill, the job notes, who was working, what was said.

Most angry reviews turn out to be half right. Talk to the staff involved, and listen for the part of their account that matches the review, so you know exactly which half.

A worked example

A steakhouse in a suburban shopping centre had its first full weekend of holiday parties, with every table booked on the Saturday.

A couple celebrating an anniversary waited forty minutes for a reserved table, and one steak came back twice. Their review that night called the staff rude, said the returned steak had been charged, and told readers to eat elsewhere.

The owner's first draft disputed every line. A manager talked him into waiting until the afternoon, by which time he had checked the booking and the bill.

A large party had overstayed its booking, so the table was late: the restaurant's failure. The returned steak had not been charged, and the desserts had been taken off the bill.

His reply the next day ran to four sentences under his own name. It apologised for the wait on their anniversary and explained it in a line.

Then it said gently that the second steak was not on the bill, offered to go through the receipt together, and gave his direct number. The reviewer phoned two days later, far calmer than the review.

Acknowledge before anything else

The first sentence decides how the rest is read. Start with what the reviewer experienced, in their terms: the wait, the cold food, the crew that arrived late.

Own the part that was yours, plainly and without a but. "Your table was not ready at the time you booked, and that was our failure" works. "We are sorry you feel the table was late" does not.

An acknowledgement is not an admission that everything in the review is true. It is a statement about the part that is.

Correcting a fact gently

Leave the exaggerations alone; arguing with adjectives looks petty.

Correct only a fact that matters to the next reader, such as a charge, a price or a safety claim, and correct it once, in plain words.

Avoid "actually", "to be clear" and "as our policy states", which turn a correction into a rebuttal. An offer to check it together leaves room for the reviewer to be right.

Never correct by revealing details: no booking names, no amounts from their bill, no account history. The reply is public; their records are not.

Offer a conversation, then stop

End with a way to reach a named person directly, by phone or email, and when that person is usually available.

Then stop. Four or five sentences is enough; anything longer reads as a defence, and a defence invites a reply. Leave out promotions, discounts and lines about your commitment to excellence.

If the reviewer answers back, one more short public line repeating the offer is enough. After that the conversation belongs on the phone, however tempting the last word.

And if a conversation settles things, it is fair to ask once whether they would update the review. Never make a refund or a gift depend on it.

The counter-case

Not every angry review deserves this treatment.

A review containing threats, slurs or personal details about a member of staff should be reported to the site, with any reply kept to a line signed with a role.

A review from someone who was never a customer needs reporting rather than a conversation. Where a lawyer is already involved, keep the public reply minimal until you have advice.

For the ordinary furious review from a real customer, the approach holds: wait, check, acknowledge, correct one fact gently, offer to talk, and stop.

Before you reply

1. Read it once, then leave it overnight.
2. Check the booking, bill or job notes.
3. Talk to the staff who were there.
4. Find the one real grievance.
5. Acknowledge it in the first sentence.
6. Correct one fact, gently, if it matters.
7. Give a direct name and number, then stop.

Step one is the hardest and matters most. Every other step depends on the reply being written by somebody who is no longer angry, and that takes a night, not a technique.

When most of the anger is about the bill, the reply follows the approach in a review that mentions a price.

Frequently asked questions

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.