Advertise the problem rather than the service, on channels that interrupt rather than answer, and expect a longer path from first contact to enquiry.

Two different jobs

Most advertising advice assumes somebody is already looking. They have a blocked drain, they search, and the job is to be there when they do.

That is capture, and it is straightforward: match the search, make the page match the advert, be findable.

Some businesses do not have that. Nobody wakes up wanting a thermal survey, an equipment finance review, or a process they have never heard of.

For those, advertising has to create the recognition first, which is a different job with different economics and a different timescale.

How to tell which you have

Two checks, and they take about twenty minutes.

Look at whether there is search volume for what you do, in the words a customer would use rather than the trade term. If a search tool shows almost nothing, that is your answer.

Then look at how your existing customers found you. If they came from referrals, from somebody explaining it to them, or from you approaching them, and almost none arrived by searching, the pattern is confirmed.

Plenty of businesses are in a mixed position: a known service that people search for, and a second thing they do not.

Those two need separate treatment rather than one campaign.

Advertise the problem, not the service

The central adjustment, and it changes what the advert says.

Somebody who has never heard of your service cannot recognise its name, and will scroll past it. They can recognise the problem it solves, because they have it.

So the first line describes the symptom in their words: the room that is always cold, the invoices arriving late, the machine that stops twice a week.

The service is introduced afterwards as the answer, rather than announced as the subject.

This is the whole difference between an advert that reaches nobody and one that reaches the right people, and it costs nothing to change.

Where to run it

The fifth is the useful hybrid. Nobody searches for the service, and people do search the symptom, which puts you in front of somebody at the moment they are trying to understand it.

Expect a longer path

The economics that catch people out.

Somebody searching for a blocked drain buys within hours. Somebody who has just learned a problem is solvable takes weeks or months, and will read, ask around, and come back.

Which means a campaign judged after ten days on enquiries will look like a failure while working perfectly.

It also means the first action should be smaller than an enquiry: a guide, an explanation, a way to find out more without committing.

And it means you need somewhere to hold people between first contact and readiness, which is what a list is for.

Businesses that try to run demand generation with an enquiry-or-nothing structure conclude it does not work, when what did not work was expecting the last step first.

A worked example

A firm offering a specialist inspection service found almost no search volume for it, and their advertising produced nothing for months.

Their existing customers had all come through one industry association and word of mouth.

They rewrote everything around the symptom rather than the service: the specific failure the inspection prevents, described the way an operations manager would describe it.

They ran that against a trade audience with a guide as the first step, rather than a request for a call.

Guide downloads started immediately. Enquiries began arriving about seven weeks later, from people who had downloaded it and then received four short emails.

Their earlier campaign had been correct in every technical respect and had been asking strangers to book an inspection for a problem they did not know they had.

Education is the product of the advertising

A reframe worth holding, because it changes what you make.

If nobody knows the problem is solvable, your advertising has to explain it, which means the useful assets are explanatory rather than promotional.

A short article about why the thing fails. A photograph of what it looks like when it goes wrong. A rough cost of not addressing it.

Those get read, shared within an organisation, and remembered, which is more than a service advert achieves.

It also compounds, since an explanation written once keeps working, whereas an advert stops when the budget stops.

The channels that are not advertising

Worth naming because they frequently outperform paid media for this.

Adjacent trades who encounter the problem before you do, and who will refer if they understand what you do.

Suppliers, associations, and anybody who publishes to your audience.

Speaking, writing, or answering questions where the people affected already gather.

These are slower and cheaper, and they suit demand generation better than most paid channels, because they carry credibility a advert cannot buy.

A business in this position should usually be doing those alongside any advertising rather than instead of it.

The counter-case

Sometimes nobody searching for it means nobody wants it.

The absence of search volume is occasionally a signal about demand rather than about awareness, and demand generation cannot manufacture a need that does not exist.

The way to tell is whether the people you explain it to respond. If you describe the problem clearly to twenty relevant people and none recognises it, the issue is the offer rather than the marketing.

There is also a cost question: creating awareness is genuinely more expensive per customer than capturing existing demand, and a business with a small budget may do better serving the demand that exists.

Test the explanation on people before funding a campaign built on it.

What to do

  1. Check search volume for the customer's words.
  2. Ask how existing customers actually found you.
  3. Lead with the problem, not the service name.
  4. Target the symptom in search, not the service.
  5. Make the first step small: a guide, not a call.
  6. Build somewhere to hold people between contact and readiness.
  7. Judge it over months, not over ten days.

Step three is the change that makes the rest possible, and most businesses in this position have never made it.

Working on what you propose is covered in the offer, not the format.


Frequently asked questions

How do I know if nobody searches for what I do?

Check search volume for the words a customer would use rather than the trade term, and ask how existing customers found you. Referrals and introductions with almost no search arrivals confirms it.

What should the advert say instead?

The problem, in the customer's words. Somebody who has never heard of your service cannot recognise its name but can recognise the symptom, because they have it.

Where should I advertise?

Channels that interrupt rather than answer: trade publications, associations, adjacent trades, and search on the symptom rather than the service, which still has volume.

Why does it take longer?

Somebody who has just learned a problem is solvable takes weeks or months, so a campaign judged on enquiries after ten days looks like a failure while working perfectly.

What should the first step be?

Smaller than an enquiry: a guide or an explanation. Then somewhere to hold people between first contact and readiness, which is what a list is for.

What if nobody responds at all?

The absence of search volume is sometimes about demand rather than awareness. Describe the problem to twenty relevant people, and if none recognises it, the offer is the issue.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Advertising a service nobody has heard of?

Lead with the problem instead of the service name. That single change is usually what has been missing.

Start a Conversation