Record yourself explaining the job to a customer and write that down. The gap between how you talk and how your site reads is the whole problem.

The gap is measurable

Ask a tradesperson what they do and you get a plain, specific, confident answer in about fifteen seconds.

Read their website and you get a paragraph about commitment, quality, and customer satisfaction that could belong to anybody.

The first is good writing and the second is not, and the business produced both.

So the task is not learning to write; it is stopping the translation that happens between speaking and typing.

What the translation adds

Nobody says any of these aloud. They appear because writing feels formal, and formality is what people reach for when they are unsure, which produces a page that sounds like every other page in the trade.

Record yourself and transcribe it

Which is the whole method and takes twenty minutes.

Put your phone on the dashboard and explain, out loud, what happens when somebody calls you about a common job.

Describe what you do first, what you look for, what it usually costs, and what could go wrong.

Then type it out, tidy the repetitions, and put it on the page.

That is a better service page than anything you would have written, because it contains the specifics you use every day and would never think to include.

Do it once per service and the whole site is written.

Four drives produces four pages, which is more than most trades sites contain.

None of it requires sitting at a desk trying to sound professional.

A worked example

A heating engineer had a services page reading like a brochure.

He recorded himself on four drives explaining four common jobs.

The transcripts contained things the brochure page never had: how long a boiler swap actually takes, why the old one usually failed, what he checks that others do not, and what he tells people who are deciding between repair and replacement.

He put the four transcripts up, lightly edited.

Enquiries mentioned the pages specifically, which had never happened before.

His words had been better than his writing for the whole eleven years.

Keep the specifics that feel too small

Which is where the tone actually lives.

The detail about parking, the note that you take your boots off, the fact that most of these take a morning, the thing that goes wrong in houses of a certain age.

Those read as somebody who has done the job many times, which is exactly the impression being sought.

Generic language is what remains when the specifics are removed, so removing them is the error rather than the polish.

If a sentence could appear on a competitor's site unchanged, it is doing nothing for you.

Test every paragraph that way and delete whatever fails the test.

A shorter page made entirely of things only you could say beats a long one made of things anybody could.

Match the register to the reader

Which is a genuine limit on writing exactly as you speak.

Speech contains hedges, repetitions, and asides that read badly on a page.

Editing removes those without touching the vocabulary or the specifics, which is the difference between transcribing and publishing.

Keep the words and the specifics, and cut only the scaffolding around them.

That distinction is what separates a transcript from a page.

And where you swear in conversation, do not, since the register of a page is public in a way a van conversation is not.

Everything else survives the transition intact.

Consistency matters more than style

Which is the practical point once the voice exists.

The website, the quotation, the reminder message, and the follow-up email should sound like the same business.

A warm site followed by a cold automated confirmation reads as a mismatch and slightly undermines the site.

Read your standard messages aloud and change any that sound like a different company wrote them, which most templates do.

That is an hour and it makes everything downstream of the website feel deliberate.

Machine-written copy has the same failure

Which is worth naming since it is now the common source.

Generated text defaults to exactly the register described above: fluent, confident, and free of anything only you would know.

Used as a starting draft it is fine, and published unedited it produces the generic page this post is about.

The fix is the same as it has always been: put your own specifics back in, and cut every sentence that could belong to anybody.

The transcription method is a better starting point, because it begins with material only you have.

One person should write it all

Which is the constraint that keeps a voice consistent once it exists.

A site written by three people over four years has three registers in it, and a reader notices the seams without being able to name what changed.

Where several people contribute, one person should pass over everything before it goes up, doing nothing except making it sound like the same business.

That is a light edit rather than a rewrite, and it takes minutes per page.

For a small business, the person who talks to customers most is usually the right one to hold that pen, whatever their view of their own writing.

The counter-case

Some businesses need formality.

A professional practice, anything regulated, or a business selling to institutions has a register expected of it, and conversational writing reads as unserious.

Speaking well and writing well are also different skills, and some people are considerably clearer on the page.

And a very informal voice can genuinely limit the kind of work a business gets considered for.

Plain is the target rather than casual, and those two are not the same thing at all.

Record yourself explaining four common jobs, transcribe them, keep the small specifics, and make the automated messages match.

What to do

  1. Record four explanations.
  2. Transcribe them.
  3. Cut the scaffolding, keep the words.
  4. Keep the small specifics.
  5. Delete anything generic.
  6. Read your templates aloud.
  7. Make them match.

Step five is the test that does the most work, since any sentence that could appear unchanged on a competitor's site is occupying space and earning nothing.

The generated-text version is covered in editing machine output into your own voice.


Frequently asked questions

What is the problem?

The translation between speaking and typing. Ask what somebody does and you get a plain specific answer; read their site and you get a paragraph that could belong to anybody.

What does the translation add?

We pride ourselves, committed to excellence, solutions instead of the actual thing, passionate about something ordinary. Nobody says any of it aloud.

What is the method?

Record yourself explaining a common job out loud, then transcribe it, tidy the repetitions, and put it on the page. Twenty minutes per service.

Why is that better?

Because it contains the specifics you use every day and would never think to include: how long it takes, what usually failed, what you check that others do not.

How much editing?

Cut the hedges, repetitions, and asides. Keep the vocabulary and the specifics. Keep the words, cut the scaffolding.

How do I test a paragraph?

Ask whether it could appear unchanged on a competitor's site. If it could, it is doing nothing for you and should be deleted.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Site reads like a brochure?

Record yourself explaining one common job on your next drive. That transcript is the page.

Start a Conversation