Followers are people eligible to see you, not people who do. Reach is typically a small fraction of the count, so measure views rather than followers.

Two different numbers

A follower count is the number of people who once decided they were willing to see your posts.

Reach is the number the platform actually showed a given post to.

On every major platform the second is a fraction of the first, frequently a small one, and the gap has widened steadily for a decade.

Which means the number displayed on your profile has very little to do with how many people see anything.

Why the gap exists

The last is the honest explanation. A platform that showed every post to every follower would have nothing to charge for, so reach declining as an account grows is a design outcome rather than a fault.

Find your own figure

Which takes two minutes and is the whole point of this.

Open your last ten posts and note the views or reach on each.

Divide the average by your follower count.

Most small business accounts land somewhere between two and ten per cent, and some considerably lower.

That percentage is the number to keep, because it converts a follower count into an actual audience.

Eight hundred followers at five per cent is forty people, which is an entirely different business decision from eight hundred.

Recalculate it once a year, since the ratio moves as the account grows and as the platform itself changes how it distributes anything at all.

A worked example

A business had spent two years growing from four hundred followers to twelve hundred and felt it was working.

Checking the reach on their recent posts, the average was about seventy views.

Two years earlier, at four hundred followers, their posts had been reaching about ninety.

They had tripled the follower count and reduced the actual audience, which is a common outcome and an entirely invisible one.

The follower number had risen every month and the number of people seeing anything had not.

They stopped reporting the follower count altogether and started reporting average views per post instead.

Growth changes the ratio

Which is the part that surprises people.

The percentage falls as an account grows, so doubling your followers does not double your reach and occasionally does not increase it at all.

Accounts that grew through a burst of unrelated attention suffer this most, since the new followers do not engage and the ranking notices.

Which is the mechanism behind the old advice against buying followers, and it applies equally to followers acquired accidentally.

A smaller number of genuinely interested local people outperforms a larger disengaged one, and the ratio is where you see it.

What to report instead

Since something has to go in the monthly note.

Average views per post, which is the actual size of your audience.

Number of posts, since that is what you controlled.

And enquiries mentioning the platform, which is the outcome.

Three numbers, none of which is the follower count, and all of which respond to something you did.

A rising follower count with falling views is a decline reported as growth, which is the specific failure this replaces.

Small and local beats large and general

Worth stating for a trade audience.

Two hundred followers who live within your service area is a better asset than four thousand scattered nationally.

The local account will produce enquiries and the large one will produce a number that looks good in a report.

So growth is not the objective and relevance is, which changes what you post and who you try to reach.

Check where your followers actually are if the platform tells you, since the answer occasionally explains everything about why the account produces nothing.

A trade with most of its followers in another country has an audience it can neither serve nor convert, however large the number looks.

Do not chase the number

Which follows from all of it.

Follow-for-follow arrangements, giveaways to unrelated audiences, and posting for a general rather than local audience all raise the count and lower the ratio.

Each of those makes the reported figure better and the actual audience worse.

Post for the specific people you actually want to reach, accept that the count grows slowly, and watch the views.

An account growing by ten relevant local followers a month is doing considerably better than one growing by two hundred irrelevant ones.

Saves and shares matter more than likes

Worth knowing, since it changes what a post is trying to do.

Most platforms treat a save or a share as a stronger signal than a like, because it indicates the content was useful rather than merely agreeable.

A post somebody saves is also a post they intend to come back to, which for a trade means a number kept for later.

So content worth keeping, such as a price guide, a checklist, or an explanation of a common decision, outperforms content that is merely pleasant to look at.

Watch saves and shares alongside views, since those two together tell you whether the reach you got was worth having.

The counter-case

The count is not entirely meaningless.

It functions as social proof for somebody deciding whether to take you seriously, and a business with eleven followers looks new whatever its reach.

A larger base also means a larger absolute reach even at a lower percentage, so growth does help within limits.

And some platforms genuinely do show posts to most followers, particularly smaller or newer ones where distribution is not yet being sold.

That is worth checking rather than assuming, since it changes the arithmetic considerably.

Work out your own reach percentage, report average views per post, and stop reporting followers.

The two minutes

  1. Open your last ten posts.
  2. Note the views on each.
  3. Average them.
  4. Divide by your follower count.
  5. Compare against two years ago.
  6. Check where followers are.
  7. Report views, not followers.

Step five is the one that reframes everything, since an account can triple its followers and reduce the number of people actually seeing anything.

The audience quality question is covered in an account with two thousand followers and no sales.


Frequently asked questions

What is the difference?

A follower count is people who once decided they were willing to see your posts. Reach is how many the platform actually showed a given post to.

How big is the gap?

On every major platform reach is a fraction of the count, frequently small. Most small business accounts land between two and ten per cent, and some lower.

Why does the gap exist?

Feeds are ranked, more accounts compete for the space, most followers are not on that day, and distribution is a product platforms sell.

How do I find my own figure?

Open your last ten posts, note the views on each, average them, and divide by your follower count. That percentage converts followers into an actual audience.

Does growth help?

Less than expected. The percentage falls as an account grows, so doubling followers does not double reach and occasionally does not increase it at all.

What should I report?

Average views per post, number of posts, and enquiries mentioning the platform. A rising follower count with falling views is a decline reported as growth.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Reporting your follower count monthly?

Divide your average post views by it. That percentage is the number that actually matters.

Start a Conversation