Sort by whether it can still be fixed, then by whether it is public. Send a holding reply to everything within the hour and resolve in that order.

Volume changes the problem

The advice for a complaint is to respond quickly, personally, and fully, which is right and assumes one at a time.

On the busiest day of the year there may be nine, arriving alongside everything else, with two hours available.

Trying to handle each one fully means the ninth waits six hours, and the person waiting six hours writes the review.

So the skill on that day is sorting rather than responding, and the sorting has to be decided in advance.

Acknowledge everything first

Before resolving anything, which is the counterintuitive part.

A holding reply to all nine takes fifteen minutes and stops the situation deteriorating while you work.

It should say the message has been read by a person, that it is being looked at, and when they will hear properly.

That single message converts somebody escalating into somebody waiting, which buys the time to do the rest properly.

Write it in advance so it takes a minute rather than being composed nine times.

Sending nothing for four hours while doing careful work on the first one is the common mistake and the expensive one.

Then sort by two questions

The first is the one that matters most at this time of year. A parcel that could still arrive before a date is urgent in a way that a wrong colour is not, because the window closes.

The order to work in

Which follows from those questions.

First, anything where acting now changes the outcome: a reshipment that could still arrive, a payment that can be stopped, a booking that can be moved.

Second, anything public or heading that way, since a review left today is read for years.

Third, anything where you are plainly in the wrong, because those get worse with delay and are cheapest to resolve early.

Fourth, everything else, which can honestly wait until tomorrow provided the holding reply went out.

That order is worth writing down, since under pressure people work in the order things arrived, which is the least useful sequence available.

A worked example

A shop had seven complaints on a single day in December, alongside their heaviest dispatch.

The owner worked through them in order of arrival, spending forty minutes on the first, which was a minor packaging issue.

The fourth, unread for three hours, was somebody whose gift had not arrived and who could still have been sent a replacement that morning.

By the time it was read the courier cutoff had passed and it became a refund and a poor review.

The following year they sent a holding reply to everything within the hour and worked in order of what could still be fixed.

The same volume produced no reviews and two replacements dispatched the same day.

Decide what you can give away

In advance, so nobody is calculating during a busy hour.

Set an amount below which anybody can refund, replace, or add a credit without asking.

Most complaints in a retail peak are resolved by one of those three, and the delay is usually somebody waiting for permission rather than the resolution itself.

The cost of a fast small resolution is almost always less than the cost of a slow correct one, particularly when the time itself is scarce.

Say plainly what is not delegated, which should be a short list: anything over the amount, anything legal, anything involving safety.

That single decision does more for handling volume than any improvement to the responses.

Batch them like anything else

Since the interruption is more expensive than the work.

Handling complaints as they arrive fragments the day and slows the dispatching, which creates the next round of complaints.

Two fixed slots a day, after the holding replies have gone out, is enough for most volumes.

Anything genuinely urgent will have been identified during the acknowledgement pass and can be pulled out.

That also lets one person handle all of them, which produces more consistent answers than three people each dealing with whatever landed in front of them.

Keep the tone the same at nine as at nine hundred

Which is the hardest part and the most visible.

Replies written under pressure become terse, and a terse reply to somebody who is upset produces a second complaint about the reply.

Prepared wording helps considerably, since it was written calmly and can be adapted rather than composed.

Read anything difficult once before sending, which catches most of it.

And where you are too pressed to write it well, the holding reply buying an hour is better than a rushed answer.

Note what caused them

A minute per complaint that pays for itself the following year.

Record the cause in a few words rather than the resolution: late courier, wrong item picked, description unclear, arrived damaged.

At the end of the season, a list of thirty causes shows a pattern that no individual complaint reveals.

Frequently one or two causes account for most of them, and both turn out to be fixable before the next peak.

Without the note, the season ends and everybody remembers that it was difficult without remembering why.

The counter-case

Triage has costs.

Somebody with a small complaint who waits a day may reasonably feel deprioritised, which is exactly what happened.

A holding reply is also worthless if the real reply does not follow, and a business that acknowledges and then forgets has made things worse.

And on most days there is no volume problem, so the ordinary advice to respond fully and quickly applies.

Acknowledge everything within the hour, work in order of what can still be fixed, and decide the delegated amount in advance.

On the day

  1. Acknowledge everything within the hour.
  2. Use prepared wording for that.
  3. Sort by what can still be fixed.
  4. Then public, then your own errors.
  5. Resolve in two fixed slots.
  6. Refund or replace below a set amount without asking.
  7. Read difficult replies once before sending.

Step one is what buys the time for the rest, since somebody who knows a person has read their message waits, and somebody who has heard nothing escalates.

Handling a single one properly is covered in a complaint that arrives by email first.

Frequently asked questions

Why is volume a different problem?

Because handling each fully means the ninth waits six hours, and the person waiting six hours writes the review. The skill becomes sorting rather than responding.

What comes first?

A holding reply to everything, which takes fifteen minutes and converts somebody escalating into somebody waiting. It should say a person has read it and when they will hear.

How should I sort them?

By whether acting now changes the outcome, then whether it is public, then whether you are plainly in the wrong, then everything else.

Why is that order right?

Because a parcel that could still arrive before a date has a window that closes, while a wrong colour does not. Working in order of arrival is the least useful sequence.

What decision helps most?

Setting an amount below which anybody can refund, replace, or credit without asking. The delay is usually waiting for permission rather than the resolution itself.

Should I handle them as they arrive?

No. That fragments the day and slows the dispatching, which creates the next round. Two fixed slots after the acknowledgements is enough for most volumes.

West Coast Media Solutions Inc. provides web design, web development, hosting, digital marketing, and business consulting to organisations across Canada, drawing on more than twenty-five years in the field.

Several complaints landing at once?

Send a holding reply to all of them first. Fifteen minutes stops the situation getting worse while you work.

Start a Conversation